SSRL Science Highlight - January 2008 | ![]() | |||||||||||||
![]() | ||||||||||||||
Life depends on the biochemical activity of the thousands of proteins that
inhabit and decorate the surface of every one of our cells. Proteins
themselves, although simple linear combinations of the twenty amino acids,
derive their remarkable properties from the complex three-dimensional
structures into which they fold. In this way, enzyme active sites are created,
protein-protein recognition surfaces are formed, and the chemistry of life is
set in motion. Although in principle the precise three-dimensional structure
for each protein is encoded in its linear chain of amino acids, in practice it
is often difficult or impossible for a protein to achieve this final fold on
its own in the context of a cellular environment that is packed to the gills
with millions of other proteins, nucleic acids, carbohydrates, lipids, and
other small molecules. As a result, cells have evolved a corps of proteins
known as molecular chaperones that assist newly synthesized proteins as they
adopt their active fold. One such family of chaperones is known as the hsp90
family (Pratt and Toft, 2003). "Client" proteins of the hsp90 family are
diverse, and their functions range from signal transduction to immune response.
Specific inhibitors of hsp90 chaperones exhibit potent anti-tumor activity
(Chiosis et al., 2006; Sharp and Workman, 2006), showing that preventing the
proper folding of client proteins, many of which are implicated in cancer, can
have profound therapeutic implications.
Figure 1. Overview of the GRP94 structure. The two protomers of the GRP94
dimer are shown in blue and cyan. (A) Ribbon drawing of side and top views.
The two N-terminal domains of the dimer do not interact, causing the
misalignment of ATP hydrolysis residues. (B) Stereo surface view of the GRP94
dimer. The twisted V shape is readily apparent.
Figure 2. Model of the GRP94 ATP hydrolysis mechanism. The conformational
changes that lead to the alignment of ATP-catalytic residues are shown. Such
rearrangements are likely to allow for the binding and release of client
proteins from the chaperone.
Primary Citation
References
Chiosis, G., Rodina, A., and Moulick, K. (2006). Emerging Hsp90 inhibitors:
from discovery to clinic. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 6, 1-8.
Dollins, D.E., Immormino, R.M., and Gewirth, D.T. (2005). Structure of
Unliganded GRP94, the Endoplasmic Reticulum Hsp90: Basis for Nucleotide-Induced
Conformational Change. J Biol Chem 280, 30438-30447.
Dollins, D.E., Warren, J.J., Immormino, R.M., and Gewirth, D.T. (2007).
Structures of GRP94-nucleotide complexes reveal mechanistic differences between
the hsp90 chaperones. Mol Cell 28, 41-56.
Immormino, R.M., Dollins, D.E., Shaffer, P.L., Soldano, K.L., Walker, M.A., and
Gewirth, D.T. (2004). Ligand-induced conformational shift in the N-terminal
domain of GRP94, an Hsp90 chaperone. J Biol Chem 279, 46162-46171.
Nicchitta, C.V. (1998). Biochemical, cell biological and immunological issues
surrounding the endoplasmic reticulum chaperone GRP94/gp96. Curr Opin Immunol
10, 103-109.
Obermann, W.M., Sondermann, H., Russo, A.A., Pavletich, N.P., and Hartl, F.U.
(1998). In vivo function of Hsp90 is dependent on ATP binding and ATP
hydrolysis. J Cell Biol 143, 901-910.
Panaretou, B., Prodromou, C., Roe, S.M., O'Brien, R., Ladbury, J.E., Piper,
P.W., and Pearl, L.H. (1998). ATP binding and hydrolysis are essential to the
function of the Hsp90 molecular chaperone in vivo. Embo J 17,
4829-4836.
Pratt, W.B., and Toft, D.O. (2003). Regulation of signaling protein function
and trafficking by the hsp90/hsp70-based chaperone machinery. Exp Biol Med
(Maywood) 228, 111-133.
Sharp, S., and Workman, P. (2006). Inhibitors of the HSP90 molecular chaperone:
current status. Adv Cancer Res 95, 323-348.
Soldano, K.L., Jivan, A., Nicchitta, C.V., and Gewirth, D.T. (2003). Structure
of the N-terminal domain of GRP94. Basis for ligand specificity and regulation.
J Biol Chem 278, 48330-48338.
|
Last Updated: | 22 January 2008 |
Content Owner: | D.E. Dollins, J.J. Warren, R.M. Immormino, and D.T. Gewirth |
Page Editor: | L. Dunn |