From: Roger Carr [Carr@SLAC.Stanford.edu]
Sent: Thursday,
March 31, 2005 4:51 PM
To: Rowen, Michael; Dell'Orco, Domenico;
Rabedeau, Thomas; Safranek, James; Hettel, Bob; Poling, Bennett
D.
Subject: BLV EPU skew quad corrector prototype
Gentlemen,
I have had Mike Swanson construct a simulated BLV beampipe 15" long
and 30 mm high, in order to test the electromagnetic skew quad corrector
concept. Ben Poling is presently applying copper strips to it, and
connecting so that they conduct in the correct manner. The strips are 25
mm wide, 0.005" thick and there is a 15 mm gap between them:
The strips are insulated above and below by Kapton tape, so the total
thickness is about 0.006", or 150 microns, and the two layers (above and below
the beampipe) thus increase the gap by 0.3 mm.
The magnetic field along the diagonal is (x = mm, y = T)
The value of the gradient is 0.238 Gauss/mm, which, if integrated over 2
meters,
gives a total of 576 Gauss, approximately the value needed to correct the
whole
skew quad error at a 30 mm gap. If we leave the permanent magnet skew
quad corrector on
the EPU, it also corrects this whole error at 30 mm, so the electrical
corrector would need
to do nothing at minimum gap. However, because the PM corrector does
not track the error as a
function of gap, the EM corrector can apply a correction on the correction
and null the error that
remains. The worst case remaining error is about 150 Gauss.
If we were to apply this correction scheme on the new BLV beampipe,
with a minimum magnet
gap of 18.6 mm, and leave the PM corrector in place, it overcorrects the
error above 30 mm, but
would undercorrect it between 18.6 and 30 mm, and the EM corrector could be
used with the
opposite sign to null the residual error.
Looking at the magnetic field above, there is some octupole superposed on
the gradient field, and its
integrated value is 0.27 Gauss/mm^2 over two meters, which is less than
James' limit of 0.4 Gauss/mm^2.
But we should probably wait for Zack Wolf to give us test results, to see
if we can live with the
amount of octupole. Of course, if we correct only a 150 Gauss error,
not a 570 Gauss error, the octupole
field will be correspondingly smaller.
Roger
--
)'(
)'( )'(
)'( )'(
)'( )'(
)'( )'(
)'(
Roger
Carr
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
Stanford Linear Accelerator
Center
MailStop 69, Building 137, room 208
2575 Sand Hill Road
Menlo
Park, CA 94025
Tel: 650-926-3965
Fax:
650-926-4100
Email:
Carr@SLAC.Stanford.edu
)'(
)'( )'(
)'( )'(
)'( )'(
)'( )'(
)'(
Notre imagination vole. Nous sommes son ombre
sur la terre - Vlad Nabokov
What are the 5 most important things you
believe to be true that are not?