From: Roger Carr [Carr@SLAC.Stanford.edu]
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 4:51 PM
To: Rowen, Michael; Dell'Orco, Domenico; Rabedeau, Thomas; Safranek, James; Hettel, Bob; Poling, Bennett D.
Subject: BLV EPU skew quad corrector prototype
Gentlemen,

I have had Mike Swanson construct a simulated BLV beampipe  15" long and 30 mm high, in order to test the electromagnetic skew quad corrector concept.  Ben Poling is presently applying copper strips to it, and connecting so that they conduct in the correct manner.  The strips are 25 mm wide, 0.005" thick and there is a 15 mm gap between them:


The strips are insulated above and below by Kapton tape, so the total thickness is about 0.006", or 150 microns, and the two layers (above and below the beampipe) thus increase the gap by 0.3 mm.


The magnetic field along the diagonal is (x = mm, y = T)


The value of the gradient is 0.238 Gauss/mm, which, if integrated over 2 meters,
gives a total of 576 Gauss, approximately the value needed to correct the whole
skew quad error at a 30 mm gap.  If we leave the permanent magnet skew quad corrector on
the EPU, it also corrects this whole error at 30 mm, so the electrical corrector would need
to do nothing at minimum gap.  However, because the PM corrector does not track the error as a
function of gap, the EM corrector can apply a correction on the correction and null the error that
remains.  The worst case remaining error is about 150 Gauss.


If we were to apply this correction scheme on the new BLV  beampipe, with a minimum magnet
gap of 18.6 mm, and leave the PM corrector in place, it overcorrects the error above 30 mm, but
would undercorrect it between 18.6 and 30 mm, and the EM corrector could be used with the
opposite sign to null the residual error.

Looking at the magnetic field above, there is some octupole superposed on the gradient field, and its
integrated value is 0.27 Gauss/mm^2 over two meters, which is less than James' limit of 0.4 Gauss/mm^2.
But we should probably wait for Zack Wolf to give us test results, to see if we can live with the
amount of octupole.  Of course, if we correct only a 150 Gauss error, not a 570 Gauss error, the octupole
field will be correspondingly smaller.


Roger



-- 
)'(       )'(       )'(       )'(       )'(       )'(       )'(       )'(       )'(       )'(     
   
Roger Carr
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
MailStop 69, Building 137, room 208
2575 Sand Hill Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025

Tel:  650-926-3965
Fax:   650-926-4100
Email:  Carr@SLAC.Stanford.edu

)'(       )'(       )'(       )'(       )'(       )'(       )'(       )'(       )'(       )'(   

Notre imagination vole.  Nous sommes son ombre sur la terre - Vlad Nabokov

What are the 5 most important things you believe to be true that are not?