SSRL Science Highlight - May 2010 | |||||||||
Archaeopteryx specimens are important but extremely rare fossils. Due to their
possession of both reptilian (jaws with teeth, long bony tail) and avian
(feathered wings) characters, Archaeopteryx has been crucial in the development
of Darwinian evolution. Despite their importance, no Archaeopteryx specimen has
ever been chemically analyzed. This in large part may be explained by the
analytical obstacles which preclude applying standard methods to such valuable
specimens; destructive sampling is not an option and most non-destructive
methods cannot handle large specimens. Furthermore, mapping using conventional
methods is far too slow to enable chemical zonation to be reasonably
determined. Mapping of trace element chemistry is of tremendous interest,
however, because it opens a window into understanding several critical
questions about Archaeopteryx in particular, and about fossil specimens in
general. Preserved trace chemistry in bones and soft tissue may be remnants of
the living organism, and therefore may give insight into life processes of
extinct organisms. When mapping includes the embedding rock matrix, mass
transfer between the fossil and the matrix can be constrained, hence giving
information about mode of preservation. Chemical analysis can also resolve
artefacts of the curation process. Finally, accurate chemical maps can also be
useful for directing future work by highlighting regions that may be promising
for other types of analysis including structural methods (CT, diffraction) or
techniques that use other parts of the electromagnetic spectrum (infra-red).
Figure. 1.
False colour SRS-XRF map of Archaeopteryx. Colour code is: Calcium-red,
Zn-green, Mn-blue. Higher intensities correspond to higher concentrations,
Almost the entire Zn inventory in this image is associated with the
Archaeopteryx bone material. Zinc apparently was present in appreciable
concentrations in the original bone (as in many extant organisms) and has been
well-sequestered within the bone over 150 million years of burial. (PNAS)
Figure 2.
Grayscale Synchrotron Rapid Scanning X-ray Fluorescence map of the phosphorous
distribution in the Thermopolis Archaeopteryx. The fossil bones are obvious, as
expected, but when imaged in this way the chemistry of the feather shafts is
also shown to be high in this element and different from the rock matrix,
indicating part of the feather chemistry has survived. Scale bar = 10 cm.
(PNAS)
The most famous aspect of the Archaeopteryx is that is has preserved
feather structure. It had been assumed up until now that these were merely
feather impressions and that none of the original chemistry of this soft-tissue
had been preserved. By scanning the matrix along with the fossil, we showed
that phosphorous and sulfur distributions in the wing regions are controlled by
the biological structure of the organism, such that the feather shafts
(rachises) are still visible and partially preserved as shown in Figure 2.
These results show the power of the SRS-XRF method in resolving the chemical
fossil since it can produce such clear results from 150 million year old soft
tissue, as well as from the much more degradation resistant bony material.
We also for the first time explored the application of X-ray absorption
spectroscopy to complement SRS-XRF scanning. Sulfur within the bone was shown
to be almost entirely present as sulfate, thus indicating that a well-known
geochemical process which deposits iron sulfide (pyritization) into fossil
bones had not affected this Archaeopteryx specimen.
Primary Citation
U. Bergmann, R. W. Morton, P. L. Manning, W. I. Sellers, S. Farrar, K. G.
Huntley, R. A. Wogelius, and P. Larson (2010) "Archaeopteryx feathers
and bone chemistry fully revealed via synchrotron imaging," Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences, published online May 11, 2010; doi:
10.1073/pnas.1001569107
| |||||||||
SSRL is supported by the Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences. The SSRL Structural Molecular Biology Program is supported by the Department of Energy, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, and by the National Institutes of Health, National Center for Research Resources, Biomedical Technology Program, and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences. |
Last Updated: | 26 May 2010 |
Content Owner: | R. Woegulis, University of Manchester |
Page Editor: | L. Dunn |