Archive-Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 07:15:40 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 10:11:15 -0400 From: Allison M Thompson Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: May Day as Child Health Day To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <20020501.101115.-1958079.1.AllisonThompson-AT- juno.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT It may not be generally known, but in 1924, May Day was named Child Health Day. Communities all around the U.S. held parades, fetes and celebrations to raise public awareness of the importance of drinking milk from t.b.-tested cows, fresh air, doctor's visits, etc. Some of the celebrations were traditional May Day type things; others involved the staging of purity plays such as "Marching to Wellville" or "Baby's Godmothers." These extolled the virtues named above. So for all of those who get up early tomorrow, please burst into the rousing song that concluded the play, "Marching to Wellville." It is sung to the tune of Marching through Georgia. Sing a song of healthy folks who have a happy life, Free from all the ills and pains that fill some days with strife Free from these diseases which we hear are often rife While we are marching to Wellville. Chorus: Hurrah! Hurrah! Pure food and water too! Hurrah! Hurrah! No time for feeling blue! So we sing and so we hope you'll all be singing too While we are marching to Wellville. Sing a song of vegetables that in the garden grow, Carrots and potatoes and the things we all love so That they'll bring us rosy cheeks sure everyone should know While we are marching to Wellville. Chorus Sing a song of exercise that makes our muscles strong, Sing a song of everything that helps the work along, Don't you want to join our band and sing our happy song? While we are marching to Wellville. Allison ("I'm not making this up") Thompson P.S. We still celebrate Child Health Day, but it is now in October, for reasons unknown. ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 15:42:37 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 18:26:12 -0400 (EDT) From: "Roger W. Broseus" Subject: A Few Choice Spaces Left: Washington (DC) Spring Ball (fwd) To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT OK: maybe more than a few choice spaces! We've got a large hall and lotsa space. This is REALLY a reminder. The 16th Annual, Washington Spring Ball is right around the corner on May 18th. Highlights: Afternoon Practice Session Followed by potluck (out-of-towners: just bring yourselves) and place to change Reception at 7:30 followed by Ball at 8:00 Did I say: Friendly dancers? Talk-thrus and prompting of dances for a few rounds INFO, including program of dances, directions and an easily printed registration form: http://www.just.net/~roger/ball2002/ -- Roger W. Broseus Registrar, 16th Annual Washington Spring Ball ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 21:35:18 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 01:27:57 -0400 From: "Dawn C. Culbertson" Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Announcing dances To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <20020502.003327.-112359.5.dcculb-AT- juno.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT I'd like to pose a question to all you good folks out there on the list: When you go to a regularly scheduled dance, how do you feel about callers announcing the dance's title in advance? Do you think it's important or doesn't it matter? In my area, callers seem to fall into 3 categories with regard to this: 1. Callers who simply go ahead and call the dance without giving its title (unless someone specifically asks from the floor) or give the title at the dance's conclusion. 2. Callers who announce the dance's title as the dancers are starting to line up (i.e. they'll say something like "Make a longways set for 'Mad Robin.'") 3. Callers who give the formation they want the dancers to take (longways, 3-couple set, circle, etc.) and then announce the name. In the interest of impartiality, I won't say which of these categories I fall into. But I'd be curious to know others' opinions on this. Dawn Culbertson ________________________________________________________________ GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/. ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 22:31:17 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 06:30:06 +0100 From: Alan Corkett Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Announcing dances To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <000c01c1f19a$7be446a0$e23f86d9-AT- default> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Date: 02 May 2002 05:36 Subject: Announcing dances Dawn wrote...How do you feel about callers announcing the dance's title in advance? As a musician, I watch a great deal from the stage and see who sits out, as much as I notice those who dance. It seems that for much of the time and for many people who are going to get up and do every dance it probably really makes little difference. To those, like my wife, who wish to be selective, due to physical reasons of arthritis, or restricted energy, hard of hearing, etc., it would be useful to be able to enter into the dances you know you can or fell able to do. Finding out late on in the call for instance that you have to "dance" this one instead of walk, may be a reason for needing to drop out again, if one is unable to rant or step or skip-change. Similarly, having sat out for an hour, if a dance comes up that is one that can be coped with, it would be nice to know in advance, rather than putting one's coat on and going home early. It's a bit like waiting for a bus, which changes or reveals its true number only when it has arrived at the stop or after you have got on! We all like to go to the right place, but not necessarily the same place. Regards Alan Corkett (a mere musician!) ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 00:19:44 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 00:11:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan Winston - SSRL Central Computing Subject: Re: Announcing dances To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Message-ID: <01KH8DUMNY2I8YEU84-AT- SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Dawn wrote: > I'd like to pose a question to all you good folks out there on the list: > When you go to a regularly scheduled dance, how do you feel about callers > announcing the dance's title in advance? Do you think it's important or > doesn't it matter? In my area, callers seem to fall into 3 categories > with regard to this: > 1. Callers who simply go ahead and call the dance without giving its > title (unless someone specifically asks from the floor) or give the title > at the dance's conclusion. > 2. Callers who announce the dance's title as the dancers are starting to > line up (i.e. they'll say something like "Make a longways set for 'Mad > Robin.'") > 3. Callers who give the formation they want the dancers to take > (longways, 3-couple set, circle, etc.) and then announce the name. I sometimes find myself calling with groups of a dozen people, half of whom might suddenly decide to sit out. So I'll say "take partners and form up and I'll tell you what we're dancing when I see how many we have." (It's particularly fun to get three couples up, pick a three-couple dance, tell the band what dance it is, and as you start to teach the three-couple dance have a fourth couple join.) I do try to make clear whether the next thing has skipping, slipping, or ranting in it. But slightly more directly-related to the question: I've found that almost invariably the cases where people ask me the name of the dance are the cases where I've already said it two or three times and they either weren't paying attention or just didn't have a referent for it. For a new dancer, "make a longways set for Ore Boggy" doesn't really tell them anything; after they've danced it, if they get the name again they have something to associate it with. And to actually answer the question, as a dancer, I like to hear "Form a [formation] for [dance name]", or possibly "the next dance is [dance name]; take partners and make a [formation]". -- Alan =============================================================================== Alan Winston --- WINSTON-AT- SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Disclaimer: I speak only for myself, not SLAC or SSRL Phone: 650/926-3056 Paper mail to: SSRL -- SLAC BIN 99, 2575 Sand Hill Rd, Menlo Park CA 94025 =============================================================================== ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 00:31:55 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 00:20:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan Winston - SSRL Central Computing Subject: Talking about 3/2 To: ecd-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Message-ID: <01KH8EAP31IQ8YEU84-AT- SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT ECDers (especially leaders, or analytical dancers) -- It's relatively easy to understand dancing in duple time - people can hear the beats clearly, it lines up well with setting steps, phrasing is usually pretty clear, and I think it's usually a good idea to start off evenings, or to start off new dancers, with duple time dances - jigs, reels, etc. It's also fairly intuitive to dance in waltz time; the most correction needed for how new dancers do it is to persuade them to put one foot _in front_ of the other and to keep fairly flat. A contra dancer who's never done English can deal with all of that. 3/2 time is different. Phrasing is often different - something that shows up fairly often is "neighbors lead out for one bar, turn and lead back in for one bar", which is often a surprise. Even in a dance-walk, you may step differently for triple time. (Some of the best dancers still take two steps for most measures and throw in an occasional three-step to "catch up".) It's just not obvious. I've internalized this well enough, but I haven't articulated it with ideal clarity. Now I sometimes want to use 3/2 tunes at Regency dancing, where there are a lot of new dancers, and I need to explain it to them in a clear and non-misleading way. (Most recently I tried to convey the idea of shorter phrases by suggesting that you may not have as much time as you expect to do things. This, of course, resulted in excessive scurrying without particular reference to the music. Oops.) One very useful thing I once saw was Bruce Hamilton pointing out exactly where the first footfall happens in "Sally in Our Alley". Do any of you have other things to say that seem to promote understanding how to dance either triple-time dances in general or specific 3/2 dances in particular; have you heard somebody say something that made you understand it? (I don't mean to limit the universe of explanation to the verbal. If you do demos or have seen demos that really helped, and can write them up, that would be lovely too.) Thanks in advance, -- Alan =============================================================================== Alan Winston --- WINSTON-AT- SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Disclaimer: I speak only for myself, not SLAC or SSRL Phone: 650/926-3056 Paper mail to: SSRL -- SLAC BIN 99, 2575 Sand Hill Rd, Menlo Park CA 94025 =============================================================================== ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 00:42:21 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 00:40:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan Winston - SSRL Central Computing Subject: Administrivia: hotmail is bouncing a lot of ECD mail To: ecd-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Message-ID: <01KH8ENNDVOC8YEU84-AT- SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT ECders -- It appears that hotmail has decided to reject ECD list mail, although the message I'm getting is not "we rejected your mail" but rather a list of a dozen ECD subscribers and a note that it was impossible to deliver to them. It's unusual to get this for a dozen on a service at a time; I think the most I've seen is two. If you're reading this on hotmail, let me know. -- Alan =============================================================================== Alan Winston --- WINSTON-AT- SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Disclaimer: I speak only for myself, not SLAC or SSRL Phone: 650/926-3056 Paper mail to: SSRL -- SLAC BIN 99, 2575 Sand Hill Rd, Menlo Park CA 94025 =============================================================================== ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 03:47:17 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 11:46:53 +0100 From: Michael Barraclough Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Announcing dances To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <200205021046.LAA30514-AT- galahad.tgis.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Dawn I try to fall into Class 2 and generally achieve this. In the UK, I suspect that most callers fall into Classes 2 or 3 if they are calling for an audience which has some knowledge (folk dancers, ceilidhs etc). If you are calling for audiences that have little or no knowledge (one night stands, eg church social or PTAs) then Class 4 (announce the shape but never give the title) is not unusual. Michael Barraclough http://www.mab.tgis.co.uk On Wednesday, May 01, 2002 at 01:27:57 AM, ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU wrote: > I'd like to pose a question to all you good folks out there on the list: > When you go to a regularly scheduled dance, how do you feel about callers > announcing the dance's title in advance? Do you think it's important or > doesn't it matter? In my area, callers seem to fall into 3 categories > with regard to this: > > 1. Callers who simply go ahead and call the dance without giving its > title (unless someone specifically asks from the floor) or give the title > at the dance's conclusion. > > 2. Callers who announce the dance's title as the dancers are starting to > line up (i.e. they'll say something like "Make a longways set for 'Mad > Robin.'") > > 3. Callers who give the formation they want the dancers to take > (longways, 3-couple set, circle, etc.) and then announce the name. > > In the interest of impartiality, I won't say which of these categories I > fall into. But I'd be curious to know others' opinions on this. > > Dawn Culbertson > > ________________________________________________________________ > GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! > Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! > Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: > http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/. > > -- ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 07:26:43 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 10:26:33 -0400 (EDT) From: David.Millstone-AT- valley.net (David Millstone) Subject: Re: Announcing dances To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Message-ID: <14658617-AT- enfield.VALLEY.NET> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT I'd like to second (or cry "Amen!") to Alan's observation: "I've found that almost invariably the cases where people ask me the name of the dance are the cases where I've already said it two or three times and they either weren't paying attention or just didn't have a referent for it." I announce titles at the start ("Form longways sets for 'Jack's Health' ") if it's a dance that I think many of the dancers will recognize by title. If it's less familiar, I'll ask for the desired formation and then, when folks are in place, I'll announce, "We're going to dance 'Miss Cumquat's Maggot,' a recent composition from the febrile brain of Vasilitis Romaneasceau." I usually repeat the title after giving the directions, and sometime again at the conclusion of having danced a less familiar one, so that the title has a chance of sinking in now that the dancers have experienced it. David "Sorry, I don't do Balkan" Millstone ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 07:45:55 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 10:43:44 -0400 From: SUSAN B BOOKER Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: RE: Announcing Dances To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <000f01c1f1e7$cd656c00$6602ffd1-AT- oemcomputer> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT I think we've discussed this, or a closely-related issue previously, but it bears further discussion, since we've surely picked up new readers/posters since. I very much prefer dances to be announced, and even better is posting dances. The only places I've seen dances posted consistently are at various Playford Balls, dance weekends, and evening events at recent Christmas Country Dance Schools. The size and visibility of the various dance posters has varied from a pencil-jotted note kept in the musicians'/caller's areas to large, clearly printed signs visible from one end of the hall to the other. The latter is a _lot_ more dancer-friendly! And why do I prefer to know what's coming up? Same old problems: bad shoulder; tricky back. I can do most dances without any trouble, given a partner who is aware and considerate. And I do let my partners know my abilities and limitations. Formation of the dance isn't a problem for me, but certain figures are, particularly those requiring "duck and dive" figures, or facing-out circles, or that figure whose name I can't recall which requires partners to link arms behind backs while facing in opposite directions. In other words, anything which torques my bad shoulder or places undue strain on my lower back. And please, no California twirls or twirled ladies' chains! I do try to firmly keep my arm low when someone tried to twirl me, but I often encounter surprised looks when this happens - as if I'm being unfriendly and uncooperative not to go along with someone else's idea of fun. That's not it at all! So, rather than subject myself to a dance which I need to alter, or to perturb partners or others, I'd rather just sit out and admire....if I knew what was coming. I can alter footwork - skipping depends on the floor surface and supportability, for example, and a quick walk-step can be substituted if need be. There are a few dances during which I'd prefer to sit out and enjoy the music. Not knowing which category is likely to be called next is extremely frustrating and limiting, as previously noted. A caller once told me it "spoiled her sponteneity" to announce or post dances. Given a choice, I'd far rather have "spoiled sponteneity" than a spoiled rotator cuff or lower back. So here's a vote for announcing and/or prominently and legibly posting dances. If only one can be done, I'd favor the latter - it's a lot more user-friendly. Thanks for bringing up this topic, Dawn. I'm presently skipping a couple of local contra dances because of this very issue. Susan Booker Lexington, KY ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 07:46:23 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 11:01:17 -0400 From: Graham.Christian-AT- risk.sungard.com Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Announcing dances To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Ideally, I say, "Form a [*] for [name]," and then perhaps specify hands-four or -six (or say, Keep your hands-# and take them somewhere in the room for a set dance). But at least as often, I'll have the band play a bit of it while the dancers are approaching sethood to change the mood and give them information (jig? duple?); some dancers will recognize the tunes. And no matter what, I get someone who (partway through the teaching) will say, What is this called? But *after* the name, by far the most common question during the announcement segment is: Is there a lot of slip-step in this dance? Graham Christian Technical Writer, Product Management Telephone number: (617)542-2800, extension 247 Email address: graham.christian-AT- risk.sungard.com Group web address: http://www.risk.sungard.com SunGard Trading and Risk Systems, BancWare 3 Post Office Square Boston, MA 02109 "Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow." ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. ********************************************************************** ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 07:50:18 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 09:50:09 -0500 (CDT) From: Jonathan Sivier Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Announcing dances To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <200205021450.g42Eo9R04561-AT- staff2.cso.uiuc.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Dawn C. Culbertson writes: > > 2. Callers who announce the dance's title as the dancers are starting to > line up (i.e. they'll say something like "Make a longways set for 'Mad > Robin.'") > > 3. Callers who give the formation they want the dancers to take > (longways, 3-couple set, circle, etc.) and then announce the name. I fall into both of these categories I suppose. I always announce the name of the dance before we dance it, but I'm not real strict about the timing of the announcement. When I'm calling contra dances I'm definitely in the 3rd group (I also announce the author of the dance). When calling ECD I tend towards the 2nd group and I would say that is my goal, but I don't always remember to do it that way. I come from a contra dance background where as a dancer it isn't necessary to know what the dance is in advance, you learn it during the walkthrough. However in our ECD group we have quite a few people from the local international folk dance group and they tend to want to know what the dance is in advance. Their tradition is to just announce the name of the dance and have everyone know not only how it goes, but what the formation is without having to be told. I don't expect that to happen with our ECD group, but I do hope that the dancers will come to recognise the names of the dances and perhaps remember some of the details of some of them. Jonathan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Jonathan Sivier |Q: How many angels can dance on the | | j-sivier-AT- uiuc.edu | head of a pin? | | Flight Simulation Lab |A: It depends on what dance you call. | | Beckman Institute | | | 405 N. Mathews | SWMDG - Single White Male | | Urbana, IL 61801 | Dance Gypsy | | Work: 217/244-1923 | | | Home: 217/359-8225 | Have shoes, will dance. | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Home page URL: http://www.uiuc.edu/ph/www/j-sivier | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 07:50:45 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 07:50:33 -0700 From: "Klein, Anita" Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: RE: Announcing dances To: "'ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU'" Message-ID: <7F0B0267D3BAD211A1A30010E37C16770759DB50-AT- nt44.alza.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_J3hg0nT7KOK+EyFu99wNuA)" This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --Boundary_(ID_J3hg0nT7KOK+EyFu99wNuA) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Another reason, as a dancer, I like to know dances in advance: I go to a regular dance that usually has more women than men. I don't mind dancing the man's part sometimes but I can't waltz as a man. If it's a dance with a waltz I want to know in advance so I can choose an appropriate partner. -----Original Message----- From: Alan Corkett [mailto:alan-AT- bcorkett.freeserve.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:30 PM To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Subject: Re: Announcing dances Date: 02 May 2002 05:36 Subject: Announcing dances Dawn wrote...How do you feel about callers announcing the dance's title in advance? As a musician, I watch a great deal from the stage and see who sits out, as much as I notice those who dance. It seems that for much of the time and for many people who are going to get up and do every dance it probably really makes little difference. To those, like my wife, who wish to be selective, due to physical reasons of arthritis, or restricted energy, hard of hearing, etc., it would be useful to be able to enter into the dances you know you can or fell able to do. Finding out late on in the call for instance that you have to "dance" this one instead of walk, may be a reason for needing to drop out again, if one is unable to rant or step or skip-change. Similarly, having sat out for an hour, if a dance comes up that is one that can be coped with, it would be nice to know in advance, rather than putting one's coat on and going home early. It's a bit like waiting for a bus, which changes or reveals its true number only when it has arrived at the stop or after you have got on! We all like to go to the right place, but not necessarily the same place. Regards Alan Corkett (a mere musician!) --Boundary_(ID_J3hg0nT7KOK+EyFu99wNuA) Content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT RE: Announcing dances

Another reason, as a dancer, I like to know dances in advance:  I go to a regular dance that usually has more women than men.  I don't mind dancing the man's part sometimes but I can't waltz as a man.  If it's a dance with a waltz I want to know in advance so I can choose an appropriate partner.

-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Corkett [mailto:alan-AT- bcorkett.freeserve.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:30 PM
To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU
Subject: Re: Announcing dances


Date: 02 May 2002 05:36 Subject: Announcing dances


Dawn wrote...How do you feel about callers announcing the dance's title in
advance?

As a musician, I watch a great deal from the stage and see who sits out, as
much as I notice those who dance.

It seems that for much of the time and for many people who are going to get
up and do every dance it probably really makes little difference.

To those, like my wife, who wish to be selective, due to physical reasons of
arthritis, or restricted energy, hard of hearing, etc., it would be useful
to be able to enter into the dances you know you can or fell able to do.

Finding out late on in the call for instance that you have to "dance" this
one instead of walk, may be a reason for needing to drop out again, if one
is unable to rant or step or skip-change.

Similarly, having sat out for an hour, if a dance comes up that is one that
can be coped with, it would be nice to know in advance, rather than putting
one's coat on and going home early.

It's a bit like waiting for a bus, which changes or reveals its true number
only when it has arrived at the stop or after you have got on! We all like
to go to the right place, but not necessarily the same place.
Regards Alan Corkett (a mere musician!)

--Boundary_(ID_J3hg0nT7KOK+EyFu99wNuA)-- ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 07:50:52 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 15:52:25 +0100 From: Trev Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Announcing dances To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <006d01c1f1e9$40219060$414579d5-AT- trevormo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT References: <20020502.003327.-112359.5.dcculb-AT- juno.com> Dawn wrote:- > I'd like to pose a question to all you good folks out there on the list: > When you go to a regularly scheduled dance, how do you feel about callers > announcing the dance's title in advance? Do you think it's important or > doesn't it matter?......... >> I must admit I like to hear the title of the dance before getting up to dance (even though I may fall into the category of "talking too much and miss it"!) I also like the band to play at least the first phrase of the tune (or play the start of the CD/tape) as this also jogs the mind into knowing what dance may be (I am terrible for remembering names) or the timing of the music. The music also registers when finishing off your sentence when you don't hear the caller announcing it. And, the most important to me, please repeat the name of the dance AFTER dancing it - it is then that you know if you if you like it or not - and if you want to remember the name in order to find out more details about it (or ignore it next time?) So, when calling, I try to carry out all the above, except if calling at a function when the name will mean nothing to anyone. But I still think it important to play some of the tune - this lets most people know the type/feel of dance coming next. Trevor Monson ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 07:55:09 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 08:01:07 -0700 From: Mary Devlin Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Announcing dances To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT My preference as a dancer is to hear something like what Alan Winston suggests: "Form a [formation] for [dance name]", or possibly "the next dance is [dance name]; take partners and make a [formation]". As I think back, I hope that's what I've usually said when announcing the next dance (and if it's not, it will be now!). As both a caller and dancer, I believe it is very important to give the name of the dance (and attribution). My practice is to give this information (again) just before the dance starts. How else can we help people start making connections between dances and their names? This is helpful for people looking at ball programs, for those who want to avoid certain figures, and for everyone -- we're a species that names things. Names help us make connections and remember. I also feel that giving dancers the tune information before the dance is critical, and this is something I very much want as a dancer. I like the musicians to play the tune through as dancers line up, or just before teaching it. Granted, this doesn't tell new dancers much in the way of the name of the dance, but it does carry a lot of information for people who've been dancing a while or who are starting to "get" the tune/dance relationship (how quickly we might be moving;, "OH! THIS dance!!; Gosh, a slip jig, etc.) (There are other benefits from this too for the musicians, but that would be another thread.) Mary ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 07:56:19 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 15:59:13 +0100 From: Trev Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Administrivia: hotmail is bouncing a lot of ECD mail To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <007601c1f1ea$05b565e0$414579d5-AT- trevormo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT References: <01KH8ENNDVOC8YEU84-AT- SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU> Alan, Could it be that Hotmail have changed there policy recently and if you have used up your 2KB it now simply ignores anything else until you delete some emails. With the amount of junk mail arriving, even if filtered into the junkmail folder (this is only deleted automatically after 2 weeks I think) your allocation can be filled in a couple of days if you do not access your account to delete everything. Trev > ECders -- > > It appears that hotmail has decided to reject ECD list mail, although the > message I'm getting is not "we rejected your mail" but rather a list of > a dozen ECD subscribers and a note that it was impossible to deliver to them. > > It's unusual to get this for a dozen on a service at a time; I think the most > I've seen is two. > > If you're reading this on hotmail, let me know. > > -- Alan > > ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 07:59:37 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 09:59:28 -0500 (CDT) From: Jonathan Sivier Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Administrivia: hotmail is bouncing a lot of ECD mail To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <200205021459.g42ExS708573-AT- staff2.cso.uiuc.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Alan Winston - SSRL Central Computing writes: > > It appears that hotmail has decided to reject ECD list mail, although the > message I'm getting is not "we rejected your mail" but rather a list of > a dozen ECD subscribers and a note that it was impossible to deliver to them. > > It's unusual to get this for a dozen on a service at a time; I think the most > I've seen is two. I've seen this happen periodically for the email lists that I run (2 on dancing, 1 on rocketry). It tends to last for a few days and then resume working as normal. Everyone on my lists who have hotmail will start bouncing and then a few days later will start working again. I've also seen it happen for other email services. Jonathan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Jonathan Sivier |Q: How many angels can dance on the | | j-sivier-AT- uiuc.edu | head of a pin? | | Flight Simulation Lab |A: It depends on what dance you call. | | Beckman Institute | | | 405 N. Mathews | SWMDG - Single White Male | | Urbana, IL 61801 | Dance Gypsy | | Work: 217/244-1923 | | | Home: 217/359-8225 | Have shoes, will dance. | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Home page URL: http://www.uiuc.edu/ph/www/j-sivier | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 08:04:06 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 10:03:58 -0500 (CDT) From: Jonathan Sivier Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Announcing dances To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <200205021503.g42F3wR10517-AT- staff2.cso.uiuc.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Michael Barraclough writes: > > I try to fall into Class 2 and generally achieve this. In the UK, I suspect that most callers fall into Classes 2 or 3 if they are calling for an audience which has some knowledge (folk dancers, ceilidhs etc). If you are calling for audiences that have little or no knowledge (one night stands, eg church social or PTAs) then Class 4 (announce the shape but never give the title) is not unusual. I still announce the title (and author) when I'm doing one night stands. I figure it only takes a couple of seconds and I want the participants to know that these dances come from somewhere. Jonathan ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 08:11:15 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 10:59:26 -0400 From: Campbell_Kaynor-AT- biogen.com Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Talking about 3/2 To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Alan, I try to say nothing about it unless it appears necessary. When it seems necessary, I prefer to demo. I often play the tune for a 3/2 dance while I walk around the dance floor so that people can SEE how my foot-falls articulate the beats. I find the usual error for dancers unfamiliar with this tempo is to scurry with no reference to the beat so I tend to over-compensate by urging them to be RELAXED but EFFICIENT because there may be fewer steps than they expect for the figures (of course in some dances/figures they have extra time compared to the analagous 2/4 figure - e.g., 6 steps rather than 4). I've written several 3/2 contras in which I actively discourage embellishments because most of the figures are shorter. For example, a Ladies Chain across (half chain) in 6 rather than 8 steps pretty much requires an assisted courtesy turn to be ready for the next figure at the beginning of the next phrase. Cammy ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 08:12:41 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 10:45:16 -0400 From: Campbell_Kaynor-AT- biogen.com Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Announcing dances To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Dawn, Most dancers ask me "what was that dance" AFTER they are done, when the pleasure of dancing it is fresh in their minds and often even though I had announced it prior to dancing it. So I think the most effective time to name a dance is after. The announcement before was meaningless to those who didn't recognize the title and they generally don't remember it when they decide after dancing that it was a title they want to learn to recognize. That's from the perspective of the caller, but I am just like those dancers described above - I struggle with names to start with and until I know that I really want to learn the name for a person or a dance, I don't bother trying However, (I always have exceptions) if I know that there are dancers out there who wouldn't want to miss the up-coming dance (and I see them not getting partners, not paying attention, socializing at the back of the hall, etc...) or on the contrary if there are people who can't stand to do the dance that I have in mind, I make a point of forewarning them. Sometimes I even name the intended dance in advance such as - "we'll start with Dargason after the break" (because there are some who really dislike this dance and the fact that they interact so little with their carefully chosen partner but there are some who revel in its venerable mystique and would be heart-broken to miss it). or "we'll do one more contra and then a waltz" (for those who want to find a particular partner for the waltz and those who are trying to decide whether to call it a night now or wait for another 15 minutes to get in a last waltz). Cammy ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 08:13:32 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 10:13:24 -0500 (CDT) From: Jonathan Sivier Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Announcing Dances To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <200205021513.g42FDOS14195-AT- staff2.cso.uiuc.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT SUSAN B BOOKER writes: > > I very much prefer dances to be announced, and even better is posting > dances. The only places I've seen dances posted consistently are at various > Playford Balls, dance weekends, and evening events at recent Christmas > Country Dance Schools. The size and visibility of the various dance posters > has varied from a pencil-jotted note kept in the musicians'/caller's areas > to large, clearly printed signs visible from one end of the hall to the > other. The latter is a _lot_ more dancer-friendly! This is probably a worthy goal, but not practical at many dances. At our balls we have a prepared order of dances which is listed in the programs, along with the formation and some other tidbits of info on the dances. However at our regular monthly dances it would be impossible to prepare a list of dances to be done in a particular order in advance and then stick to it. The variation in attendance, both in numbers and experience make that impossible. We come up with a list of possible dances in order to let the band know which ones to prepare, but it is always much larger than we will have time for. Then we evaluate how many dancers we have and what their skill level is and choose dances from the list on the fly. Since this can change during the course of the evening, as people arrive or leave, we have to be able to adapt to the changing situation. Jonathan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Jonathan Sivier |Q: How many angels can dance on the | | j-sivier-AT- uiuc.edu | head of a pin? | | Flight Simulation Lab |A: It depends on what dance you call. | | Beckman Institute | | | 405 N. Mathews | SWMDG - Single White Male | | Urbana, IL 61801 | Dance Gypsy | | Work: 217/244-1923 | | | Home: 217/359-8225 | Have shoes, will dance. | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Home page URL: http://www.uiuc.edu/ph/www/j-sivier | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 08:16:28 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 10:08:20 -0500 From: Mike Mudrey Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Announcing dances To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20020502100613.00b0ab00-AT- mail.mhtc.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_CDKjJ8qVYxD+NyQERI7s0A)" --Boundary_(ID_CDKjJ8qVYxD+NyQERI7s0A) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT At 01:27 AM 5/1/02 -0400, you wrote: >I'd like to pose a question to all you good folks out there on the list: >When you go to a regularly scheduled dance, how do you feel about callers >announcing the dance's title in advance? Do you think it's important or >doesn't it matter? In my area, callers seem to fall into 3 categories >with regard to this: me... "Form a longways set for Mr Smith's Maggot" "Hand four, duple minor" "Walk as I talk it" "Listen to the tune for tempo, etc" "Mr Smiths Maggot begins with first couple crossing..." .... "That was Mr. Smith's Maggot" (Dawn...in a nutshell I do like like callers/briefs that make me guess at the dance.....!!!" --Boundary_(ID_CDKjJ8qVYxD+NyQERI7s0A) Content-type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT At 01:27 AM 5/1/02 -0400, you wrote:
I'd like to pose a question to all you good folks out there on the list:
When you go to a regularly scheduled dance, how do you feel about callers
announcing the dance's title in advance? Do you think it's important or
doesn't it matter? In my area, callers seem to fall into 3 categories
with regard to this:


me...

"Form a longways set for Mr Smith's Maggot"

"Hand four, duple minor"

"Walk as I talk it"

"Listen to the tune for tempo, etc"

"Mr Smiths Maggot begins with first couple crossing..."


....


"That was Mr. Smith's Maggot"








(Dawn...in a nutshell I do like like callers/briefs that make me guess at the dance.....!!!"
--Boundary_(ID_CDKjJ8qVYxD+NyQERI7s0A)-- ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 08:35:31 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 11:36:38 -0400 From: "Emily L. Ferguson" Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Announcing Dances To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT References: <200205021513.g42FDOS14195-AT- staff2.cso.uiuc.edu> >SUSAN B BOOKER writes: >> > > I very much prefer dances to be announced, and even better is posting > > dances. Then At 10:13 AM -0500 5/2/02, Jonathan Sivier wrote: > This is probably a worthy goal, but not practical at many dances. It's really not that difficult. All it takes is a piece of black/white board and chalk or some whiteboard markers. Rest the board up against the piano or something at the top of the room and write in the name of the dance as the sets are assembling. People who don't like to rant will know when to sit out, people who can't stand some specific dance will then not get trapped in to it, and everyone will start to learn the names, which is essential to ECD, to me. After all, we have names attached to melodies to dance figure sequences - 3 cues to remembering. And remembering is what permits better dancing because it frees the mind to anticipate and prepare to be on time for the next figure. It also frees the mind to attend to the music so that the dancers dance with the music - a really important thing for good dancing. In addition it frees the leader from having to prompt the entire dance and both add to the noise level and keep the dancers from hearing the music. -- Emily L. Ferguson elf-AT- cape.com 508-563-6822 New England landscapes, wooden boats and races, press photography Beetle cats on the web at: http://www.beetlecat.com/gft-pics/ef-notes.htm http://www.beetlecat.org/results/99champs.html http://www.beetlecat.org/store.html#yrbook landscape at: http://www.capecodlife.com/CCD/regions/upper_cape.html ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 08:36:49 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 11:32:49 -0400 From: Dick Wexelblat Subject: On Announcing dances - a comment from one with physical limitations To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Message-ID: <3CD15C21.2070901-AT- comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT References: <20020502.003327.-112359.5.dcculb-AT- juno.com> <006d01c1f1e9$40219060$414579d5-AT- trevormo> Due to physical problems, there are some dances I cannot do, do only with difficulty, or prefer  to avoid so as not to "drag down" others.  As I've been English dancing for a while (since 1955) I'm familiar enough with the repertory that for the most part, I can decide upon hearing the name of the dance whether I can do it or not.  

So I'd very much like the caller to announce the dance in advance.  That's preferable, for example, to dropping out of the middle of a set during teaching, always getting in at the bottom, spoiling the dance for others, or hurting myself.  

Some callers let me see the program in advance but some appear insulted when I ask.  Even explaining why appears to some to be an imposition.  My physical limitations are not apparent so I've even been accused of lying to get a peek at a program.

To be honest, I'd like to see programs posted and have callers announce a change as early as possible.

    Regards
       
    Dick Wexelblat

P.S.  I know she was just trying to be kind, but I really hated it a few years ago when one caller "helped me" by announcing over the mike, "Dick, you don't want to do this one."  (...Without bothering to tell us the name of the dance.)
================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 08:40:53 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 11:07:57 -0400 From: Campbell_Kaynor-AT- biogen.com Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Announcing dances To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT I forgot to say, 1) Announcing a title before dancing a dance, can scare a newcomer by giving the impression that one is expected to recognize the name and know the figures even if this is not the case. At the least, it makes it terribly obvious the gap that exists between those who do know the dance (by their exclamations of dismay or pleasure) and the newer dancers who already are feeling somewhat uncertain and self-conscious. 2) Rather than give the title beforehand, I very often say things like - "the next dance is easier," or "faster and more active," or "more difficult so try to find a partner who knows what they are doing." As Alan said, it is helpful for children, people with physical constraints (e.g., arthritis), etc... if they know that the next number will be selected to accomodate their special needs. Cammy ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 08:48:41 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 11:41:07 -0400 From: Anne Lowenthal Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Announcing dances To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <002a01c1f1f0$6eedae40$8a8cfea9-AT- oemcomputer> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT References: <20020502.003327.-112359.5.dcculb-AT- juno.com> Friends, For the past few years at our regular Tuesday English dances in New York, we've been posting the program. Either I or the caller for that dance will prepare about six copies, which we'll put on the walls around the hall. Thus, in addition to hearing an announcement of a given dance's title either as the sets are forming or in the course of the walk-through, dancers can scan the program at any point in the evening. They do that frequently, especially at the beginning of the dance, or sometimes even quickly breaking out of a set to check a name--and the programs disappear from the walls after the dance is over. We began to do this in hopes that knowing the names of the dances would add enjoyment and increase familiarity with the repertoire. Then, in addition to the immediate practical advantage of enabling dancers to plan ahead, either to guard or spend their energies, there's our annual Gotham Assembly to think about. At the beginning of the fall season, all CD*NY members vote on their five favorite dances from a list of the hundreds we did the previous year. Knowing the names helps! But there's another advantage to knowing the name of a dance you're about to do. It provides a kind of jump start, with kinetic memory (or whatever kind of memory works for you) helping you through the patterns associated with the title. More efficient teaching and a higher level of dancing can be among the rewards. Anne Lowenthal ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 08:57:29 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 11:35:26 -0400 From: Campbell_Kaynor-AT- biogen.com Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: RE: Announcing Dances To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Susan Booker said: I very much prefer dances to be announced, and even better is posting dances. The only places I've seen dances posted consistently are at various Playford Balls, dance weekends, and evening events at recent Christmas Country Dance Schools. The size and visibility of the various dance posters has varied from a pencil-jotted note kept in the musicians'/caller's areas to large, clearly printed signs visible from one end of the hall to the other. The latter is a _lot_ more dancer-friendly! And why do I prefer to know what's coming up? Same old problems: bad shoulder; tricky back. I can do most dances without any trouble, given a partner who is aware and considerate. And I do let my partners know my abilities and limitations.... 1) I consider it one of the obligations of any dance leader to constantly assess the dancers as to their capabilities, likes, and dislikes in order to send them home as satisfied with their evening as possible. If I can't tell, in short order, that person X hates to twirl, person Y has a shoulder problem, person Q finds it difficult to steer person R (who has motor and conceptualization problems) through a circular hey, then I have failed in my obligation. I think that I may be able to change someone's dislikes so I take some risks that may or may not pan out. 2) We all make mistakes, but in my opinion none could be worse than devising a program for the evening in advance without consideration to any of the above concerns. My program is determined by what I already know about the regulars through previous encounters, which of the regulars happen to be there on this night, and what I learn as I watch each dance through the evening. Having someone approach me early in the evening and say "can you tell me when you're doing a dance that doesn't have swinging" or "one that is especially good for children" is a great luxury. Most dancers are far more subtle and one has to search the faces for fleeting expressions of anticipation, delight, dismay, disappointment, etc... In any dance crowd, there are always conflicting desires, but the talent in dance leadership really shows when the leader crafts the evening repertoire to satisfy everyone present as best it can be done - this includes the musicians. Knowing that the sit-ins struggled with the last tune figures in my decision about the next in which I try to ask for something they know well. 3) On top of all of this, I have my own preferences and tastes and even philosophical tenets that color the choices I make and gradually dancers of similar taste are attracted, some who are open-minded evolve a similar taste, and some who don't "prefer" my approach still enjoy variety and come for a dose of a different approach and different repertoire. Cammy ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 09:12:35 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 12:09:44 -0400 From: Anne Lowenthal Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Announcing Dances To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <005201c1f1f3$c707ab00$8a8cfea9-AT- oemcomputer> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT References: <200205021513.g42FDOS14195-AT- staff2.cso.uiuc.edu> Our posted programs are printed out, not graven in stone, and callers can add, subtract, and substitute dances in response to the unexpected, such as a sizeable influx of new dancers. But we have found it useful to plan programs so as to concentrate teaching early in the evening, put the most difficult dances where energy and attention levels are likely to be high, and save the end of the evening for just dancing. Anne L. ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 09:15:05 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 11:11:25 -0500 From: "M.G. Mudrey, Jr." Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Announcing dances To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20020502105555.00afac90-AT- mail.mhtc.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_c7HFB7NZdMRkFymoCo2afQ)" --Boundary_(ID_c7HFB7NZdMRkFymoCo2afQ) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT At 11:07 AM 5/2/02 -0400, you wrote: >2) Rather than give the title beforehand, I very often say things like - >"the next dance is easier," or "faster and more active," or "more difficult >so try to find a partner who knows what they are doing." As Alan said, it >is helpful for children, people with physical constraints (e.g., >arthritis), etc... if they know that the next number will be selected to >accomodate their special needs. > >Cammy As long as you tell them the name of the dance. If we do not let them know that is being danced, dancers are in no position to request a particuar/specific dance. Easier or more difficult is not useful. No dance is hard if you know it; no dance is easy if you have not seen it. It would be more instructive to say "why" you think it is harder or easier. Is it because of the number of figure, length of the dance, complexity of the tune, etc. When novice and skilled dancers are all being taught a new dance, then all are on the same knowledge level. In that case, I have found that there is not necessarily a distinction among among the dancers. I recall a long, contorted Scottish dance that we learned in the beginners group before the more skilled dancers came, and we ended up doing the teaching demo for them! Jonathan mentioned another item that I forgot....write the dance name down before or during forming of the set (I use a small, dry erase board with easel ...perhaps with a note (key figure, history, etc to help recall). I have some mild cognitive memory problems, and I have become more aware of verbal, kinesthetic, and demo learning. Use all of them to be effective...tell them what you are going to do, do it, tell them what they did (to paraphrase teaching tell what what you are going to tell them, tell them, tell them what you told them). mm M.G. Mudrey, Jr. Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey University of Wisconsin-Extension 3817 Mineral Point Road Madison, WI 53705-5100 USA Voice: 608-263-5495 Fax: 608-262-8086 Email: mgmudrey-AT- wisc.edu Survey Web Site: http://www.uwex.edu/wgnhs/ --Boundary_(ID_c7HFB7NZdMRkFymoCo2afQ) Content-type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT At 11:07 AM 5/2/02 -0400, you wrote:

2) Rather than give the title beforehand, I very often say things like -
"the next dance is easier," or "faster and more active," or "more difficult
so try to find a partner who knows what they are doing." As Alan said, it
is helpful for children, people with physical constraints (e.g.,
arthritis), etc... if they know that the next number will be selected to
accomodate their special needs.

Cammy

As long as you tell them the name of the dance.  If we do not let them know that is being danced, dancers are in no position to request a particuar/specific dance.

Easier or more difficult is not useful.  No dance is hard if you know it; no dance is easy if you have not seen it.

It would be more instructive to say "why" you think it is harder or easier.  Is it because of the number of figure, length of the dance, complexity of the tune, etc.

When novice and skilled dancers are all being taught a new dance, then all are on the same knowledge level. In that case, I have found that there is not necessarily a distinction among among the dancers.  I recall a long, contorted Scottish dance that we learned in the beginners group before the more skilled dancers came, and we ended up doing the teaching demo for them!

Jonathan mentioned another item that I forgot....write the dance name down before or during forming of the set (I use a small, dry erase board with easel ...perhaps with a note (key figure, history, etc to help recall). 

I have some mild cognitive memory problems, and I have become more aware of verbal, kinesthetic, and demo learning.  Use all of them to be effective...tell them what you are going to do, do it, tell them what they did (to paraphrase teaching tell what what you are going to tell them, tell them, tell them what you told them).

mm

M.G. Mudrey, Jr.
Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey
University of Wisconsin-Extension
3817 Mineral Point Road
Madison, WI 53705-5100
USA

Voice: 608-263-5495
Fax:    608-262-8086
Email: mgmudrey-AT- wisc.edu

Survey Web Site: http://www.uwex.edu/wgnhs/
--Boundary_(ID_c7HFB7NZdMRkFymoCo2afQ)-- ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 09:16:07 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 11:18:57 -0500 From: Larry Stout Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Announcing dances To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <3CD166F1.CD14AEE3-AT- sun.iwu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT As a musician I need for the dance to be announced before people start forming sets so I can find the relevant music (We have arrangements of some pieces which, alas, often might be in any one of four or five different notebooks--if I organized my music collection it might be more efficient, but it still takes a little time.) I also like to know if the dance coming up is one that I want to dance rather than playing. Saying what the formation is is essential for ECD, particularly if the group has become so used to contras that they automatically line up in duple minor improper longways formation. As a dancer I prefer the pattern "Form two couple sets for Heliotrope Maggot" with the music played once through the tune while the sets form. Information about the source of the dance and a reminder of its name at the end are also nice to have. At my favorite dance camps that pattern is common. When I do contra dances I assume that every dance will have the same formation, interchangeable music (not quite-- as a musician I've been in on the "balances in B1--a lively bouncy jig would be good" discussion for the choice of tunes immediately before the dance starts) and not enough distinct variation for the names to matter much. Even there I would like to be warned that the next dance is a triple progression Beckett (which I might want to avoid) or a triple minor (which I'd want to be in). Larry -- Lawrence Neff Stout Professor of Mathematics Illinois Wesleyan University http://www.iwu.edu/~lstout "Fiddling is a viol habit." Anon? "Dancing is necessary in a well ordered society." Thoinot Arbeau ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 09:29:35 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 11:48:43 -0400 From: Campbell_Kaynor-AT- biogen.com Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Announcing Dances To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT I agree with Emily and Susan - that seeing the name of a dance written out is helpful in learning to recognize it. Very often I cannot hear what the caller said so it is helpful to see it written on a board. However, I wouldn't recommend a board that has lists of requests, lists of what's done and the name of what's coming up all on the same one. I can never find the name of a dance at the Boston Wednesday nights because there is so much on the board and I always have to ask someone to assist me in discovering it. ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 09:48:52 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 09:48:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Barbara Ruth Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Announcing dances To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <20020502164843.12973.qmail-AT- web13601.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT --- Trev wrote: > I must admit I like to hear the title of the dance before getting > up to dance. >I also like the band to play at least the first phrase of > the tune as this also jogs the mind into knowing what dance may be > > And, the most important to me, please repeat the name of the dance > AFTER dancing it - it is then that you know if you if you like it or >not - and if you want to remember the name in order to find out more >details about it (or ignore it next time?) As a dancer I second all three points. I've never liked or quite understood the English dance rationale for not revealing programs or refusing to announce dances until after people are lined up for it (with contra dancing nowadays it doesn't matter, because all the dances are the same). It's like the Whitman's chocolate sampler box approach - you aren't allowed to know what you've chosen until you bite into it, and then you're not allowed to spit it out, or put the rest back no matter how much you may dislike it. I've always thought there was something mean-spirited about the way those boxes always included things that nobody would possibly choose (does anyone like those jelly-filled things?) but gave you no clue as to what they are, sort of "ha-ha, you think you're about to taste something wonderful and we've got you." There's that same mean-spiritedness in the, "We don't give out the program because then dancers would make their own choices about what they want to dance, and with whom", approach. It's legitimate for callers to not have a whole program that they can list in advance because they are adapting to the particular dancers who are attending each evening - "I'm in charge and the program is for me to know and you to find out" is not. In any case, there is no excuse for not announcing the name of the upcoming dance immediately, even if one doesn't have an entire evening programed. Repeating the name of the dance at the end of it, as Trevor and others have suggested also helps people to associate a name with with a particular dance. Of course, if we Americans could get out of the habit of grabbing new partners and forming up sets the nannosecond a dance ends, and adopt the British custom as I understand of taking a few minutes between dances and only forming up once the new dance is announced, it would also help alleviate some of the problems of people having to commit to a dance without knowing whether it's one they might have problems with, or even just don't enjoy doing. Finally, to Trevor's middle point, it's hugely helpful as a dancer to hear the music first. In addition to jogging the memory when a name doesn't, it's really a requirement for learning a new dance. In the New Haven dances, the custom has always been to "hear a few bars of the music" first, but I have been in other situations where there is no musical preview and the entire walk-through is taught without any music. Thus when the dance starts you have no idea of tempo, or how to time sequences to the music. ===== "There is no inverse relationship between freedom and security. Less of one does not lead to more of the other. People with no rights are not safe from terrorist attack." Molly Ivins __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 10:16:35 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 10:16:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Barbara Ruth Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Announcing dances To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <20020502171626.18086.qmail-AT- web13601.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT --- Campbell_Kaynor-AT- biogen.com wrote: > 1) Announcing a title before dancing a dance, can scare a newcomer > by giving the impression that one is expected to recognize the name > and know the figures even if this is not the case. I find this doubtful. There is a lot going on for newcomers, and much of it is intimidating, but it becomes obvious after one dance that each dance is taught, regardless of whether it's name is announced first. > > 2) Rather than give the title beforehand, I very often say things > like - "the next dance is easier," or "faster and more active," or > "more difficult so try to find a partner who knows what they are > doing." These provide very little information if one is trying to avoid particular dances due to physical limitations. For me, when my knee is bothering me there are some dances I can't do. There are other times when my sinuses act up which gives me dizzy spells. In that case I might be just fine with everything except "Trip to Paris" or "Long Odds". Someone with a back or shoulder problem would have entirely different dances that they shouldn't do. Each individual has a much better idea of what dances are good for them and what aren't than the caller possibly could. Barbara ===== "There is no inverse relationship between freedom and security. Less of one does not lead to more of the other. People with no rights are not safe from terrorist attack." Molly Ivins __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 10:42:45 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 13:42:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Dfhart24-AT- aol.com Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Announcing dances To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <16c.d0e95a5.2a02d46c-AT- aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_0i4T6i2sNSYHNtljRoaBlA)" --Boundary_(ID_0i4T6i2sNSYHNtljRoaBlA) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT In a message dated 5/2/2002 12:37:09 AM Eastern Daylight Time, dcculb-AT- juno.com writes: > > I'd like to pose a question to all you good folks out there on the list: > When you go to a regularly scheduled dance, how do you feel about callers > announcing the dance's title in advance? My preference is to have the dance's title announced twice. First along with the call to line up (in which formation) for the next dance, and then again after the teaching is completed and just before the dance begins. Deborah --Boundary_(ID_0i4T6i2sNSYHNtljRoaBlA) Content-type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT In a message dated 5/2/2002 12:37:09 AM Eastern Daylight Time, dcculb-AT- juno.com writes:



I'd like to pose a question to all you good folks out there on the list:
When you go to a regularly scheduled dance, how do you feel about callers
announcing the dance's title in advance?


My preference is to have the dance's title announced twice.  First along with the call to line up (in which formation) for the next dance, and then again after the teaching is completed and just before the dance begins.

Deborah
--Boundary_(ID_0i4T6i2sNSYHNtljRoaBlA)-- ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 11:08:14 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 11:08:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Lyrl Catherine Ahern Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Join us on May Day morning to dance up the sun To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <20020502180804.67124.qmail-AT- web13802.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT > Portland area Morris Dancers will be dancing at 5:00am at > the Rose Test Garden in Washington Park (not at the > original Rose Garden in Peninsula Park a block down the > street from me.) ;-{( I didn't know you danced Morris anymore. Is this your once- a-year event? --L. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 12:11:24 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 12:14:50 -0700 From: Ruth Temple Subject: Re: Announcing dances To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Message-ID: <3CD1902A.3000501-AT- ix.netcom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT References: <20020502.003327.-112359.5.dcculb-AT- juno.com> My opinion, cheerfully engaged! I happen to be in favor of 2 or 3, and am one of those who will ask the name of a dance if it hasn't been told after we've done it, because I like to know -- even though I have a rotten short-term memory for names on the fly; if I then want to go back home and learn the tune for XYZ, it will have at least that familiarity for me and sink more easily into my longer term memory. I don't have a preference for whether the form or the title is announced first, though I do like having both those pieces of information. My best preference is for folks who'll give a one-sentence history or a word about the author of a modern dance, so folks can get, or build up over time, that sense of fitting into the larger pattern of dancers, and those who make dances, in the world. When a caller forgets give the name of the dance, and never mentions sources, they've left out some of what makes this dance, and this community, so special to me, and I feel that lack when it happens. Thank you for the query! Ruth Temple in San Francisco Dawn C. Culbertson wrote: > I'd like to pose a question to all you good folks out there on the list: > When you go to a regularly scheduled dance, how do you feel about callers > announcing the dance's title in advance? Do you think it's important or > doesn't it matter? In my area, callers seem to fall into 3 categories > with regard to this: > > 1. Callers who simply go ahead and call the dance without giving its > title (unless someone specifically asks from the floor) or give the title > at the dance's conclusion. > > 2. Callers who announce the dance's title as the dancers are starting to > line up (i.e. they'll say something like "Make a longways set for 'Mad > Robin.'") > > 3. Callers who give the formation they want the dancers to take > (longways, 3-couple set, circle, etc.) and then announce the name. > > In the interest of impartiality, I won't say which of these categories I > fall into. But I'd be curious to know others' opinions on this. > > Dawn Culbertson > > ________________________________________________________________ > GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! > Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! > Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: > http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/. > > ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 12:54:04 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 12:53:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Lyrl Catherine Ahern Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Announcing Dances To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <20020502195355.66301.qmail-AT- web13801.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT > All it takes is a piece of black/white board and chalk or > some whiteboard markers.... write in the name of the > dance as the sets are assembling. Last night at the Boston Centre dance, while the whiteboard listed the dances, the red marker was on its way out, so it was pink and totally illegible from halfway down the hall. The other problem is that people write in all caps. Typographers have informed us that people read by the patterns made by the ascenders and descenders of lower case letters -- the classic example in graphics classes are the outlines of dog and DOG (Guess which one we can read?). > People who don't like to rant will know when to sit out... Unfortunately, the announcement comes after the set has formed, since we are in the habit of forming new sets as soon as one dance ends. Several years ago when I had a severe problem with my energy level, I had to leave partners in the lurch on a number of occasions; I felt badly and was a bit embarassed. Now I have a foot injury which gives me no problem as long as I don't rant or skip on it. Recently, some of our callers have started saying at the end of a dance "That was X, and the next dance will be a rant." I want to thank them. Lyrl __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 13:06:20 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 13:06:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Lyrl Catherine Ahern Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: RE: Announcing Dances To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <20020502200612.39102.qmail-AT- web13805.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT --- SUSAN B BOOKER wrote: > Formation of the dance isn't a problem for me, but certain > figures are, particularly....facing-out circles.... Perfectly painless if done with hands down. Who was it decided that they should be done up? Did this person have a sadistic streak, or was he only 24? This discussion is revealing how many of us are starting to fall apart--I'm not the only one. However, it beats the alternative. Lyrl __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 14:45:42 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 18:00:39 -0400 From: Graham.Christian-AT- risk.sungard.com Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Announcing Dances &c. To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT I have known both callers who share projected programs and callers who don't, and I can't (frankly) fathom the latter, except as an instance of control issues. I'm always delighted to show a dancer my program--it might *whet* their appetite for the evening--with the caveat, "Of course, this could all go out the window if twenty beginners arrive." And my feeling is that if we grab partners and rush to form sets, we're pretty well *obliged* to dance the next, whatever it may be (unless health concerns really prevent, in which case--if, say, I were Lyrl's partner for a rant or Barbara's for TtoP--I'd be obliged to sit out with him/her unless he/she specifically urged me to dance with another). If people are going to book ahead, in my experience they will do so whether they know the content of the evening or not. When calling, I can't stop them; perhaps I shouldn't try. I cannot guard *all* dancers against every sort of pitfall--*and* get the dance started. It is desirable to offer the name & a tidbit of background, a taste of the tune, the formation, &c. I might well be able to say, "It's a rant/waltz/jig." But if I keep going & offer more--about levels & figures &c. I will hear complaints about over-talking and over-teaching faster than you can say "Fenterlarick." In the course of the teaching, I will try to say, You don't *have* to "slip" here; or, You can get through this fig-8 with a fast walking step. There are dances where you must skip (or not get there) but not many. As for these back-ring concerns: 'Perfectly painless if done with hands down. Who was it decided that they should be done up? Did this person have a sadistic streak, or was he only 24?' As far as I'm concerned, this "hands-up" thing is *not* a back-ring: it's the Funky Chicken. Graham Christian Technical Writer, Product Management Telephone number: (617)542-2800, extension 247 Email address: graham.christian-AT- risk.sungard.com Group web address: http://www.risk.sungard.com SunGard Trading and Risk Systems, BancWare 3 Post Office Square Boston, MA 02109 "Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow." ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. ********************************************************************** ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 14:48:02 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 17:45:51 -0400 From: Campbell_Kaynor-AT- biogen.com Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Announcing dances To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT |---------+------------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | "M.G. Mudrey, Jr." | | | | | cc: | | | Sent by: | Subject: Re: Announcing dances | | | owner-ecd-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.| | | | STANFORD.EDU | | | | | | | | | | | | 02-May-2002 12:11 PM | | | | Please respond to ECD | | |---------+------------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| At 11:07 AM 5/2/02 -0400, you wrote: 2) Rather than give the title beforehand, I very often say things like - "the next dance is easier," or "faster and more active," or "more difficult so try to find a partner who knows what they are doing." As Alan said, it is helpful for children, people with physical constraints (e.g., arthritis), etc... if they know that the next number will be selected to accomodate their special needs. Cammy As long as you tell them the name of the dance. If we do not let them know that is being danced, dancers are in no position to request a particuar/specific dance. Easier or more difficult is not useful. No dance is hard if you know it; no dance is easy if you have not seen it. It would be more instructive to say "why" you think it is harder or easier. Is it because of the number of figure, length of the dance, complexity of the tune, etc. Dear M. G. Mudrey, Jr. et alia, Based on the responses of a number of you, I see I should have been more explicit with my examples. 2a) When I perceive that a new dancer has finished a dance feeling frustrated, inadequate, and inclined to think that the skills required to do these dances are beyond their capability, I say "the next dance will be an easier one" in an attempt to dissuade them from calling it an evening but rather to stick around and try one more. I make sure it IS one that they can encompass although whether it is actually easier or not is debatable. I absolutely agree that what makes a dance easy or hard has little to do with the choreography and far more to do with how it is taught, how the tune is played, and how much confidence the dancers have in whether the caller can get them through it or not. The words "the next dance will be easier" is far more informative than anything else I can think of to the dancer in the predicament I just described. Announcing "the next dance is Trip to Paris" would simply drive them out the door because they hear this as confirmation that this is beyond them - they don't recognize the name of the dance (never having heard it), a number of the other dancers (who look like they are experienced to the newcomer, whether they are or not) just said "Yeah!" which means THEY recognize it.... To tell such a dancer WHY I think the next will be easier is pointless because they are not informed enough to understand that it was too many figures or awkward timing or whatever that made them feel like they had to struggle through the previous dance. To attempt to explain would only make the situation worse. 2b) When I say "the next dance is more active" it is because I perceived during the last dance that some dancers felt bored or uninspired and I sense the urge to get off some energy. Once again, it may simply have a livelier tune and not really be more active if I am trying to balance keeping them happy with another who doesn't like too bouncy dances because of arthritis, but at least I make sure it has opportunities for the energetic dancers to embellish as in Trip to Paris without requiring lots of vigor. 2c) When I say "the next dance is more difficult (or challenging)" once again it is only in direct response to signals I picked up during the last one that indicate many of the dancers felt under-challenged and are craving something that will make them think. I could go on with the criteria that bring out such announcements, but the idea is that my dancers DO find these informative in that they sense that I know how they feel at that moment and I am addressing the situation with a choice of dance that should gratify what they felt the last one lacked. This is not a substitute for naming the dance. At the point that I make these announcements, I have no idea what the next dance will be because I don't know whether the over-extended newcomer will in fact get a partner for the next dance (I don't want to be accommodating someone who isn't even in the dance) nor do I know how many will be lined up to dance, and I may not have picked up the sense of the musicians for what they are itching for. Once the dancers are in fact lined up and ready to begin, I usually say "this dance is Hunsdon House, it was first published in 1651, here is a picture of the place it is named after (The Playford Ball is a good reference to hold up for the dancers to come over and ogle the picture) and here is how it goes"... This kind of intro is informative but avoids the Ooos and Ahs that can cow a newcomer when the caller says "form square sets for Hunsdon House." After the dance is over is when I am inundated with people who say "what was the name of that dance?" This is why I feel it is more meaningful to them after they find out that they enjoy it. Although it is nice to have a knowledgeable dance community, ECD in particular has a reputation for cliquishness and snootiness. To infer that there is an "in crowd" or that the dancers ought to be able to recognize and recall dances by their names by announcing them in such a manner can only exacerbate this reputation. Because there is so little overlap between my favorite repertoire and those done by the CDS dances in Arlington Mass., I rarely recognize a dance by name and even I (by no means a newcomer) feel intimidated by such announcements. (Fortunately, in my experience the dancers tend to be quite helpful and I can usually fumble through OK and being a caller I can learn the figures pretty quickly but without faith based on such experience, I would probably leave). In 1976 when I was too poor to pay admission to Ted Sannella's contradances, I sat by the exit door and collected repertoire. In this position I was had a golden opportunity to observe numerous first-timers leaving the hall and often overheard their discussions. It was the same kind of thing - the caller gave the impression that they should recognize the dances by name. He would announce the next dance is Ted's Triplet number 9 and there would be wild applause and the beginners would leave. This technique worked well for him at this dance (as does the announcing of titles at the Boston CDS English) because these dances were/are well attended by a large core of experienced dancers. Ted was too good a caller to use this technique at a dance where he was trying to attract newcomers. The point is that it is a technique that caters to the experienced dancers and makes them stand out as different from the run of the mill dancers who only attend on occasion and who have little interest in mastering the titles of a core repertoire. I like to have a large co-erasable board near me when I call to write the name of the dance that we are doing in large letters for all to see. I like to print out calls, title, and authorship information in large black print which I paste on shirt card type cardboard for dancers to pick up and look at on the edge of the stage and sometimes I have the dancers take a card and try their hand at teaching a dance. I always try to include both music and calls on every notebook I have for musicians so that they understand that the real prompting for the choreography should come from them (I merely assist where the musicians have been unclear). There are countless ways to try to impress the dancers with the depth of the field, to familiarize them with the titles of dances and music, etc... and all of them should be employed except where the effect might be to drive potential participants away. Anyway, that's my take on it, Cammy ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 17:03:43 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 17:03:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Peterson Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: RE: Announcing Dances To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <20020503000333.47121.qmail-AT- web20009.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT --- Lyrl Catherine Ahern wrote: > This discussion is revealing how many of us are starting to > fall apart--I'm not the only one. However, it beats the > alternative. Are you telling me what I have to look forward to? After all, you have five years on me. ;-}) Andy __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 17:09:14 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 17:09:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Peterson Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Join us on May Day morning to dance up the sun To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <20020503000904.57619.qmail-AT- web20001.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT --- Lyrl Catherine Ahern wrote: > > Portland area Morris Dancers will be dancing at 5:00am at > > the Rose Test Garden in Washington Park (not at the > > original Rose Garden in Peninsula Park a block down the > > street from me.) ;-{( > > I didn't know you danced Morris anymore. Is this your once- > a-year event? Actually, I never got past _thinking_ about going since I woke up at 4:30am one day too early and decided to get a good night's sleep Tuesday night. Andy __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 17:34:47 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 20:32:47 -0400 From: SUSAN B BOOKER Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Announcing dances etc. To: ecd-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <000701c1f23a$0de1a080$0802ffd1-AT- oemcomputer> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cammy indicates that new dancers may be intimidated by perceiving the enthusiastic response of more experienced dancers to announced dances. Isn't it equally likely that such enthusiasm would whet new dancers' curiousity and interest in learning such enjoyable dances? For me, it's not a matter of "hard" or "easy" dances - I've been a dancer for over 20 years. It's not the complexity of the dance - it's the particular figures which may be injurious. Without knowing what dances are upcoming, I have no way of knowing what they may include. Of course I encounter dances which are new to me...and to most other dancers. Like everyone else, I learn them as they are taught. But the old favorites recurr frequently on typical dance nights, and while most of them are wonderful dances, some of them are better for me than others. I don't like being limited by physical concerns - but if I disregard such limits, I will only acquire more limits, and that I refuse to do. So it appears to be a question of teaching anonymous dances whose advance naming might _possibly_ put-off new, easily intimidated dancers, who _might_ be unfamiliar with the names of the old favorites which are enthusiastically welcomed by more experienced dancers, or discouraging experienced but physically vulnerable dancers from taking the floor for fear of likely injury. Must concern for one group or the other necessarily preclude concern and caring for the other? I question the idea that naming dances and others' resulting enthusiastic welcome for such dances is somehow intimidating for new dancers. This is an assumption made for others - whereas the chronic injuries and/or less-than-optimal physical conditions with which many of us live and dance are all too real. Thanks to everyone for some very interesting and thought-provoking posts on this topic. Susan Booker Lexington, KY ...and I always thought the invariable applause for "Ted's Triplet Number Whatever" was an in-joke! I never can keep them all straight...whereas if they had real _names_... ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 17:48:07 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 17:47:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Peterson Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Announcing dances To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <20020503004758.90033.qmail-AT- web20007.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT > --- Trev wrote: > > I must admit I like to hear the title of the dance before > > getting up to dance. > > > I also like the band to play at least the first phrase of > > the tune as this also jogs the mind into knowing what dance > > may be I found years ago that it took me a long time to remember a dance by name, but if you play the tune my mind generally acknowledges familiarity. I find this is even more true of Scandinavian dances because of the foreign names. There are dances I've been performing for over ten years that still have evaded being remembered by name, but play the music and it comes back. I especially tend to remember the ones that I like, as well as those I particularly dislike. > > And, the most important to me, please repeat the name of the > > dance AFTER dancing it - it is then that you know if you if > > you like it or not - and if you want to remember the name in > > order to find out more details about it (or ignore it next > > time?) Repetition does help. --- Barbara Ruth wrote: > As a dancer I second all three points. I've never liked or > quite understood the English dance rationale for not revealing > programs or refusing to announce dances until after people are > lined up for it (with contra dancing nowadays it doesn't > matter, because all the dances are the same). When they line up immediately after the previous dance, people tend to congregate into longways sets, which then have to be undone into the correct formation. Then there are those who still aren't listening when the teacher repeats for the third or fourth time that it is a three couple set, etc. > It's like the Whitman's chocolate sampler box > approach - you aren't allowed to know what you've chosen until > you bite into it, and then you're not allowed to spit it out, > or put the rest back no matter how much you may dislike it. Of course one of the hard and fast rules of set dancing is that you can't drop out in the middle of the dance. Occasionally some overwhelmed beginner will, and causes complete confusion for most of the rest of the set. I can only remember dropping out in the middle of a set once, and it was a medical emergency of sorts, someone who was not a regular dancer had given my partner a bloody nose during a Contra at a Folklife participant's party. > ...There's that same mean-spiritedness in the, "We > don't give out the program because then dancers would make > their own choices about what they want to dance, and with > whom", approach. I don't condone booking way ahead and rarely do unless there is a particular person that I want to dance with and am having trouble "catching" between dances. If I know the program and there is a dance I particularly enjoy doing with a particular person, I will ask them for that dance. I've also been left standing out by partners who forgot that they had agreed to do a particular dance about three or four dances ago. > It's legitimate for callers to not have a whole program that > they can list in advance because they are adapting to the > particular dancers who are attending each evening - "I'm in > charge and the program is for me to know and you to find out" > is not. It's understandable to adjust a predetermined program to better fit the audience, but in any case is courteous to let the dancers know well ahead of time what the program will be. I especially appreciate callers who will announce what the next dance will be in between teaching and dancing the current one. That practice gives people with restrictive injuries/disabilities plenty of time to know _not_ to line up for a dance that they know they can't do. > In any case, there is no excuse for not announcing the name of > the upcoming dance immediately, even if one doesn't have an > entire evening programed. There also is not really any excuse for turning your back on the current dance so that you can get out your cards and plan what you are going to do next. You should be a bit further ahead of yourself than that in your planning. I'm thinking of one particular caller who rarely knew when there was a problem on the floor because he wasn't paying attention. > ...I have been in other situations where there is no musical > preview and the entire walk-through is taught without any > music. Thus when the dance starts you have no idea of tempo, > or how to time sequences to the music. I've also run into callers who don't have relationship between the dance and music set in their head well enough to get the phrasing right when they start calling it. Thinking it through while the band is playing it would also help the caller. Andy __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 17:54:58 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 17:54:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Peterson Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Announcing Dances To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <20020503005449.40622.qmail-AT- web20005.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT --- Campbell_Kaynor-AT- biogen.com wrote: > However, I wouldn't recommend a board that has lists of > requests, lists of what's done and the name of what's coming up > all on the same one. I can never find the name of a dance at > the Boston Wednesday nights because there is so much on the > board and I always have to ask someone to assist me in > discovering it. At our Scandinavian dances we have a card, about 4"x15" with the name of each dance on it. All dances that have been taught over the years have a card, although if it hasn't been taught recently there are often few people who know it. The cards are put on a board several dances ahead so that everyone knows what is coming up. Dances are graded by difficulty and also have the flag of the country of origin. Andy __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 18:11:01 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 21:07:04 -0400 From: "Linda M. Nelson" Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Announcing dances To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT References: <20020502.003327.-112359.5.dcculb-AT- juno.com> >2. Callers who announce the dance's title as the dancers are starting to >line up (i.e. they'll say something like "Make a longways set for 'Mad >Robin.'") I like, and opt for, a variation on this. Yes, I announce the dance name (and other relevant info) with the formation. A dance list is also posted in a few locations around the hall (with the caveat that actual mileage *might* vary), so the dancers who need to know have some idea of what to expect. Wherever possible, I also have the musicians play the music for the upcoming dance while the dancers are assembling. That cues the knowledgeable while setting the mood and pace for all of the dancers. (Can also function as timing check for music.) ECD music is rich and varied... one of the reasons some of us are drawn to dance... why not make every possible use of it? Cheers - Linda ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 18:31:30 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 21:20:31 -0400 From: Campbell_Kaynor-AT- biogen.com Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Announcing dances etc. To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT ...and I always thought the invariable applause for "Ted's Triplet Number Whatever" was an in-joke! I never can keep them all straight...whereas if they had real _names_... That is precisely my point. I doubt any of the experienced dancers knew the triplets by number. It was the "in-joke"-ness of the event that the beginners were discussing as they left the dance. Cammy indicates that new dancers may be intimidated by perceiving the enthusiastic response of more experienced dancers to announced dances. Isn't it equally likely that such enthusiasm would whet new dancers' curiousity and interest in learning such enjoyable dances? In my experience it is not "equally likely" but less likely. An uninhibited newcomer CAN be carried along by the excitement of those in the know, but these are few and far between compared to the newcomers who think they need lessons before they can even try to do it. So it appears to be a question of teaching anonymous dances whose advance naming might _possibly_ put-off new, easily intimidated dancers, who _might_ be unfamiliar with the names of the old favorites which are enthusiastically welcomed by more experienced dancers, or discouraging experienced but physically vulnerable dancers from taking the floor for fear of likely injury. Must concern for one group or the other necessarily preclude concern and caring for the other? I am not suggesting that one CANNOT announce the name of a dance ahead of time for the sake of those who wish to be selective. I am suggesting that if it is done it should be in a way least likely to segregate the experienced dancers from the less experienced. "Form sets for XXX" implies that some in the crowd know this dance (at least to the timid newcomer) "The next dance is XXX, published by so-and-so on such and such a date" gives the impression that I don't EXPECT anyone to know it - i.e. beginners and experienced will learn this dance together. I question the idea that naming dances and others' resulting enthusiastic welcome for such dances is somehow intimidating for new dancers. This is an assumption made for others - whereas the chronic injuries and/or less-than-optimal physical conditions with which many of us live and dance are all too real. This is NOT "an assumption made for others." I take the time to talk to newcomers who are leaving any dance (mine or anyone else's), to invite them back some other time and express how important their presence is to us, to offer to be their partner and coach them with personal tutorial, to convey in whatever way seems most appropriate that these dances are healthy on many levels and enjoyable to nearly everyone. In the process, I glean their first impressions, their disappointments, what they were hoping for, etc... Sometimes they had the time of their life and they were just tired. Sometimes they just needed a friendly face to invite them back. Sometimes I steer them to another venue more suitable for what they want. Being sensitive to those who are reluctant to speak their minds on the dance floor in the midst of strangers is a no-brainer as far as I'm concerned, but then again - my dance experience is mostly based in the small community countryside dances where each individual counts and one has to endeavor to keep them all coming back for more. Cammy ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 19:00:09 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 21:25:30 -0400 From: Campbell_Kaynor-AT- biogen.com Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: music To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT preview and the entire walk-through is taught without any > music. Thus when the dance starts you have no idea of tempo, > or how to time sequences to the music. I've also run into callers who don't have relationship between the dance and music set in their head well enough to get the phrasing right when they start calling it. Thinking it through while the band is playing it would also help the caller. Andy Andy, I have a very difficult time teaching a dance if I can't think of the tune. When I look back at my book it is usually to get the tune so I can remember how the dance goes rather than to get the calls. CK ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 19:53:48 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 22:54:49 -0400 From: Albert Blank & Nancy DeVore Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Announcing dances To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <3CD1FBF9.3FC152BB-AT- sprintmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_7S8O2id5K2etH2nExBhCnQ)" References: --Boundary_(ID_7S8O2id5K2etH2nExBhCnQ) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Cammy wrote: > He would > announce the next dance is Ted's Triplet number 9 and there would be wild > applause and the beginners would leave. > Too bad the newcomers didn't understand that this was a big joke. The people who were applauding so wildly usually didn't have the faintest as to what the next dance was. Ciao, Al --Boundary_(ID_7S8O2id5K2etH2nExBhCnQ) Content-type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Cammy wrote:
He would
announce the next dance is Ted's Triplet number 9 and there would be wild
applause and the beginners would leave.


Too bad the newcomers didn't understand that this was a big joke. The people who were applauding so wildly usually didn't have the faintest as to what the next dance was.

Ciao,
Al
  --Boundary_(ID_7S8O2id5K2etH2nExBhCnQ)-- ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 20:05:31 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 23:05:22 -0400 (EDT) From: CF1125-AT- aol.com Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Announcing Dances To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <89.17729255.2a035872-AT- aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT In a message dated 5/3/02 1:55:47 AM, lyrlsbro-AT- yahoo.com writes: << At our Scandinavian dances...also have the flag of the country of origin. Andy >> That would get a bit repetitive in ECD, don't you think? Carl Friedman ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 20:14:20 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 22:50:14 -0400 From: franch-AT- juno.com Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Physical Limitations (was Announcing Dances) To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <20020502.231028.-430199.0.franch-AT- juno.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT I've changed the subject line because I think that we need to move one of the underlying themes to the surface. One of the reasons some people like to know the dances in advance is because they have physical limitations. Knowing what the dance is going to be allows them to participate or not, depending on the stress the dance would cause them. Another way to consider the issue is to ask, "what modifications are possible in the way the dance is done?" This might require support from the caller and also calls for consensus among the dancers. Consider The Fandango (or any other slipping circle dance). When everyone's knees, hips, and body parts are in good shape, a full bore attempt at all 12 feet off the floor at once is fun. But one can also do a circle at a walk and, done with style and proper tension, be in the spirit of the dance. I've also seen dancers (prior agreement very important here!) step either outside or inside the circle while the remaining five dancers slip around with zoom and verve. Similarly, an individual might be able to abstain from ranting and do the rest of the dance. I'm sure the List could provide other examples of dances in which dancers could make adjustments that made an otherwise inaccessible dance accessible to a member of the community. Mike Franch Baltimore, Md. USA ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 20:46:25 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 23:44:31 -0400 From: SUSAN B BOOKER Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Physical Limitations (was announcing dances) To: ecd-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <000f01c1f254$d6c9ab40$0802ffd1-AT- oemcomputer> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cammy, it is certainly commendable that you are so sensitively concerned about the well-being of your novice dancers. Would that all callers and group organizers, in large communities or small, were so welcoming. And it is interesting that correct phrasing of one's announcement of an upcoming dance's name and other relevant information (formation, brief history, dance composer, etc.) seems more welcoming and/or all-inclusive to any who might consider taking the floor for such a dance. As far as I, and perhaps other experienced dancers with mild physical wear and tear are concerned, the point is not in _how_ such announcements are phrased - it's whether or not they are made at all. As previously noted, posting dances is a great help. So is identifying dances by name _before_ dancers take the dance floor. Others have noted feeling self-conscious, embarrassed, and distressed for one's partner and set at having to excuse oneself belatedly from the dance floor. It's almost equally difficult to miss a much-loved dance because it isn't announced in time to find a partner. So really, I have no preference whatsoever as to how such dance announcements are made - just make them in time for me to decide what is best for me. That's all. Susan Booker ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 23:00:15 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 22:59:25 -0700 From: Chris Sackett & Brooke Friendly Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Announcing dances To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <3CD2273E.202ADE11-AT- opendoor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; x-mac-creator=4D4F5353; x-mac-type=54455854; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT References: <20020502164843.12973.qmail-AT- web13601.mail.yahoo.com> Barbara Ruth wrote:... > Of course, if we Americans could get out of the habit of grabbing new > partners and forming up sets the nannosecond a dance ends, and adopt > the British custom as I understand of taking a few minutes between > dances and only forming up once the new dance is announced, it would > also help alleviate some of the problems of people having to commit > to a dance without knowing whether it's one they might have problems > with, or even just don't enjoy doing. > What she said! It was very funny at Graham Christian's session at NEFFA - it was (before) the beginning of the session, the musicians were just getting settled and he hadn't even stepped up to the mic yet and there was the whole room lined up in longways sets. When he did get up to the mic he very cheerfully said something such as 'well actually the first dance is a big circle'... Brooke in Ashland OR ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 23:28:33 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 23:27:50 -0700 From: Chris Sackett & Brooke Friendly Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Talking about 3/2 To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <3CD22DE7.B431E06D-AT- opendoor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; x-mac-creator=4D4F5353; x-mac-type=54455854; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT References: <01KH8EAP31IQ8YEU84-AT- SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU> I like have the music playing - with less experienced dancers I'll start moving to it to give people a sense of how to move and then invite them to do likewise. That gives people a chance to get the feel of the music and appropriate movement for it without the stress of fitting figures to it. Then when I start teaching the dance I make sure to doodle or talk rhythmically as they walk it through - 'lead out, deedle-dee, dum; & back, deedle-dee, dum' (each bit separated by a comma being one beat) or 'lead out, deedle, and turn (with enthusiam on the 'and turn' part to give them the idea that they do something different than keep going for a 4th beat); lead back, deedle, to place' - argh, this is hard to do sitting at a computer... If I notice people not getting it I will do a quick demo of said figure with dancers who are, while doodling. Sometimes the figures can take longer than in duple time - there are some 3/2 dances with, for example, rights and lefts where it is actually 6 steps per hand rather than 4 (or a faster 3). This is just as problematic as 'not having as much time so people scurry through' because you don't want people shuffling along because you said it takes longer. Another example - Lady William's Delight by Rich Galloway has lines of 4 doing long leads down/up - I might do something like 'lead down, deedle-keep, going; dum-pa, deedle-dee, dum' (I sure hope I don't sound as silly when I do this live as it looks typed out.) I don't like to count steps and I try for as few explanatory words as possible - relying rather on the music and practicing/showing movement. Brooke in Oregon Alan Winston - SSRL Central Computing wrote: > ECDers (especially leaders, or analytical dancers) -- > > It's relatively easy to understand dancing in duple time - people can hear the > beats clearly, it lines up well with setting steps, phrasing is usually pretty > clear, and I think it's usually a good idea to start off evenings, or to start > off new dancers, with duple time dances - jigs, reels, etc. It's also fairly > intuitive to dance in waltz time; the most correction needed for how new > dancers do it is to persuade them to put one foot _in front_ of the other and > to keep fairly flat. A contra dancer who's never done English can deal with > all of that. > > 3/2 time is different. Phrasing is often different - something that shows up > fairly often is "neighbors lead out for one bar, turn and lead back in for one > bar", which is often a surprise. Even in a dance-walk, you may step > differently for triple time. (Some of the best dancers still take two steps > for most measures and throw in an occasional three-step to "catch up".) It's > just not obvious. I've internalized this well enough, but I haven't > articulated it with ideal clarity. Now I sometimes want to use 3/2 tunes at > Regency dancing, where there are a lot of new dancers, and I need to explain it > to them in a clear and non-misleading way. > > (Most recently I tried to convey the idea of shorter phrases by suggesting that > you may not have as much time as you expect to do things. This, of course, > resulted in excessive scurrying without particular reference to the music. > Oops.) > > One very useful thing I once saw was Bruce Hamilton pointing out exactly where > the first footfall happens in "Sally in Our Alley". Do any of you have other > things to say that seem to promote understanding how to dance either > triple-time dances in general or specific 3/2 dances in particular; have you > heard somebody say something that made you understand it? > > (I don't mean to limit the universe of explanation to the verbal. If you do > demos or have seen demos that really helped, and can write them up, that > would be lovely too.) > > Thanks in advance, > > -- Alan > > =============================================================================== > Alan Winston --- WINSTON-AT- SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU > Disclaimer: I speak only for myself, not SLAC or SSRL Phone: 650/926-3056 > Paper mail to: SSRL -- SLAC BIN 99, 2575 Sand Hill Rd, Menlo Park CA 94025 > =============================================================================== ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 07:48:57 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 10:48:52 -0400 From: "Stephen D. Corrsin" Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: announcing dances To: ecd-digest-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU BCC: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT I speak as someone who has no ambition ever to be an ECD caller/ teacher/ whatever, and if he had such ambition, no dance group or series in its collective right mind would ever allow me to fulfill said ambitions. I'd just as soon not know what the forthcoming dance is. That way everything is an interesting surprise. And to be honest, I expect to be fully and entirely occupied with chattering away with my partner or neighbors and generally genially socializing, while the caller is trying to shuffle through his/ her notes, or muttering the name of the dance into the mike. It can be interesting to learn what the hell the dance was afterwards, however. In fact, that's what I usually consult the chart for. (When there is a chart or list of dances posted.) On the occasions when I think a new dance is worth remembering. yrs Steve C. Steve Corrsin 5166 Patrick Rd. West Bloomfield MI 48322 tel 248-661-6283 fax 248-661-6288 _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 23:31:33 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 21:36:08 -0700 From: Paul / Victoria Bestock Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: no whiteboards please To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.1.20020503183807.00a4a4c0-AT- mail.oz.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT At 12:53 PM 5/2/02 -0700, Lyrl wrote > > All it takes is a piece of black/white board and chalk or > > some whiteboard markers.... write in the name of the > > dance as the sets are assembling. All it takes is some whiteboard markers to get 20% of our musicians and dancers scurrying for their inhalers! Or for the exit door. (Overheard at a dance by a band-member, "How can I play the recorder if I can't breathe?") I love to have the program posted, but solvent-based products such as whiteboard markers and permanent marking pens cause serious health problems for me and many others with asthma or MCS. For a healthier environment in which all will be able to breathe comfortably, use butcher paper and either crayons or wate