Archive-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 00:27:47 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 03:27:35 -0500 (EST) From: Tideswell-AT- aol.com Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: John Tallis's Canon Boldly Goes etc To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <17f.459c8fe.29b09577-AT- aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Alan held forth: >The analogy is: People who do this stuff are claiming a role in the creative >process. [snip] >they decline >to be passive consumers of TV entertainment. Their imaginations are actively >engaged in the universe, in the characters - and they have to understand >it >well enough that the characters in their stories are, convincingingly, >the same >characters that appear in the show, [snip] >They know Gene Roddenberry didn't mean for Kirk and Spock to get it on, >but it >suits their purposes to do it and their job is to make it plausible and >sexy. Yeah, just as long as they don't get them started doing Vulcan Country Dancing! live long and perspire Nilos ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 00:59:35 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 00:59:26 -0800 (PST) From: Andrew Peterson Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: *John Tallis's Canon* To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <20020301085926.44720.qmail-AT- web20006.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT --- "Emily L. Ferguson" wrote: > 3. Turning single there risks physically running in to the > person progressing in the other direction That depends very much on how one dances. If you are dancing with an awareness of where you are going and what is between you and that place, you won't run into people, unless they go the wrong direction. One thing that I have become very aware of recently is that many people don't think ahead to the next figure and dance _through_ a position. They dance to it, pause and regroup teir thoughts, then move into the next figure. I have noticed this to be true regardless of the experience level of the dancers. I even see it in performing groups (including mine) when people have rehearsed a dance many times and are very familiar with it. > 4. Beginners can't tell an ornament from the real thing and > get misled, as is rampant in contra dancing So, none of us should ever do anything that might be the least bit ornamental for fear of misleading a beginner? In Contras, I will rarely turn the lady under my arm on a ladies chain unless I know her well and know her ability, and yet I constantly have my arm wrenched out of the socket by people I never saw before, because other guys have been turning them and, mistakenly, they've come to expect that everyone does that turn. So who's misleading whom? To quote Genny Shimer, "I resist!" > 5. Beginners and perennial low intermediates get driven away > from the dancing by being bumped in to, or otherwise confused > by the ornamenting dancers Not to mention those of us who dance predictably and have competence and experience, and who get kicked or tripped by people who are out of place or unexpectedly change direction because nobody is teaching dance etiquette, control, conciousness of space and courtesy to those same beginners and "perennial low intermediates", whom I prefer to call perpetual beginners. There are some of those that I've known for 30 years, and they never get any better. My experience is quite the opposite, that many good experienced people (some of my favorite partners) never come dancing any more because they are tired of being injured, particularly by the clueless perpetual beginners. > 7. the TS spoils the symmetry of the progression, and symmetry > was a big preoccupation for Pat The only symmetry during the progression is what occurs between the corners, as there is no interaction between the first and second corners in the progression unless someone goes the wrong way, causing an choreographed violent interaction. Whether or not I do I do the TS, as a first corner, I move in and down around the second corner to my right who is (or should be) backing straight out. If I'm a second corner, I move up and inward around the first corner who should be in front of me as they start their move forward toward their new corner. Andy in PDX OR __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - Send FREE e-cards for every occasion! http://greetings.yahoo.com ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 01:18:36 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 01:18:27 -0800 (PST) From: Andrew Peterson Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: *John Tallis's Canon* To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <20020301091827.4266.qmail-AT- web20009.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT > --- "Emily L. Ferguson" wrote: > > 4. Beginners can't tell an ornament from the real thing and > > get misled, as is rampant in contra dancing Like that d**ned clapping on Petronella turns... I probably shouldn't have started _that_ one again... I seem to remember a version of Petronella that started with the turn and ended with the balance in a circle. It was started with the ones turning single into the center to form a diamond, man facing up and woman facing down. As the ones start down the center in the B-1 music, the twos get out of the center by quickly turning to original place. Most of the new dances that have "Petronella turns" seem to start with the balancing in a circle and then turning single into the next position, and everyone is on the sides of the set rather than being in a diamond. Andy in PDX OR __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - Send FREE e-cards for every occasion! http://greetings.yahoo.com ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 08:28:02 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 11:27:29 -0500 From: Campbell_Kaynor-AT- biogen.com Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: *John Tallis's Canon* To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT To build on the comments by Andy on JTC, here are some of my thoughts: > 3. Turning single there risks physically running in to the > person progressing in the other direction Besides his well thought out points, I have encouraged dancers in crowded corners to TS at this point precisely so that they do NOT collide with the 2nd corners (or as often happens, precede them by crossing behind rather than in front of the retreating 2nd corners). > 4. Beginners can't tell an ornament from the real thing and > get misled, as is rampant in contra dancing Any dancer worth their salt can distinguish the newcomers and adjust their style for least confusion when they are dancing together. As a caller, I often preface a dance by saying that I have modified the figures to suit my taste and that one cannot count on the same interpretation at other's dances. However, this is more meaningful to the experienced dancers and it suffices for the newcomers to accept that what I have taught them is a "variant." > 5. Beginners and perennial low intermediates get driven away > from the dancing by being bumped in to, or otherwise confused > by the ornamenting dancers Or they may be drawn to the fun, excitement and creativity obviously being experienced by the veterans on the dance floor. I have seen more beginners turned away because they thought doing the dances correctly was more important than having fun doing them, that the other dancers were "stuffy," and the most common observation from a newcomer leaving the dance - "you need to take lessons before you can join in." > 7. the TS spoils the symmetry of the progression, and symmetry > was a big preoccupation for Pat The figure is as symmetrical either way. I still say the choice depends on the space available. It is not good dancing to tread in place for half of the 8 steps of approach allotted to the progression and beginning of the next time through. Experienced dancers will and do discover ways to absorb the extra music in cramped quarters without interrupting the flow. For the newer dancers, some direction toward a "standard embellishment" is part of their training in developing skills toward appropriate improvisation. Cammy Kaynor ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 08:44:21 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 11:43:16 -0500 From: SUSAN B BOOKER Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: "Dance Angels": Who Awards the Halos? and: Excessive Embellishments.. To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <004c01c1c140$30ca0c20$2602ffd1-AT- oemcomputer> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT I really like the idea of "dance angels" - but how are they to be determined? Often, especially at "contemporary" contra dances (as well as some local ECDs), I've seen dancers with only a couple of months of experience, or"perpetual beginners" assume that they are experts. While their willingness to help even more rank beginners is commendable, the results often leave much to be desired, and badly learned practices spread. It would be far preferable to channel such willingness and enthusiasm into helping at the door, making and distributing flyers, providing refreshments, etc. - but the crunch comes in one-to-one intereaction on the dance floor, and thus is out of the control of the dance leaders. So are "dance angels" self-appointed, or are they pre-selected by dance leaders? Which dance leaders? Callers for weekend dances are frequently imported, and don't know the composition of local dance communities. And weekend dances often have a very different group of dancers than do the (typically) week-night sessions, which in my area, are more devoted to learning and practice...whereas many of the offending weekenders show up once every month or so, and show little interest in weeknight events (they've been repeatedly invited, and it's free the first time; VERY reasonable after that. And when they do show up, they are made welcome). I quite agree with Andy's points about unnecessary and annoying "embellishments"- it seems that newcomers pick up on the ruffles and flourishes well before they acquire the basics, probably because the "extras" are showy and eye-catching. With a tricky left shoulder, I avoid dance venues where I know I'll be unwillingly twirled and turned under by those whose enthusiasm exceeds their expertise. Yes, Genny also told me to "Resist!", but sometimes it's not possible, when a dancer is physically stronger and insistent (and completely in his own world, and showing no regard for his partner or others on the dance floor). Obviously, I always tell my partners that I have a problem with the left shoulder, and they are usually considerate about it. But what about others in the set? How does a dancer with a slight limitation notify them without seeming to be accusatory or portraying herself as a frail flower? And it's the badly done ruffles and flourishes that cause the problems... I've even had a corner try to turn me under (by the left arm) when I was wearing a sling. Not just a scarf wrapped around my arm - a real sling. I found myself blurting out, "I can't do that!" on this occasion, but there has to be a better way. Such obliviousness isn't confined to newcomers, of course...and is a related but separate issue. Lately I seem to be more frustrated than happy with the state of local weekend predominately contra dances, so my attendance has dropped way off (and don't get me started with the gender balance issue re. local big contra workshop and dance weekends). I still am active within the local ECD community, where dance doltishness is less predominate, probably because there are more workshops and weeknight instruction available, but I'd like to enjoy local contra dances again, too. I'm more than willing to help interested newcomers learn, and always try to tactfully ask them to dance, or help with learning a buzz-step swing, or progression, or crossing over, or rights and lefts, contra corners, or any of the other figures which are typical pitfalls for newcomers. And I remember well when I was the newcomer, and how much I appreciated help from experienced friends, and how self-conscious I felt about my clumsiness and inevitable mistakes and confusion. So despite my criticism, I feel a great deal of compassion for those who sincerely want to learn. It's those who don't - and won't - learn that frustrate me. Solving this one is beyond me, however..although tactful words from experienced dancers and callers; generally addressed to those who unknowingly err may be of some use to those who are willing to listen and learn. Other suggestions? Susan Booker, in Lexington, KY ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 08:46:13 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 16:46:14 +0000 From: Hugh Stewart Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: How do you spell chassay? To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <3C7FB055.B645BA55-AT- ugs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT References: <199902010310.TAA07396-AT- m9.sprynet.com> Someone asked me to proof-read a book of dances he is about to print, and I was worried about the spelling of the word chassay. My dictionary only allows me c h a s s e-acute (I'm not risking non-USASCII characters!), as does Webster The CDMs use chassay. Sets in Order use sashay (but then we all know that they can't even spell do si do so who's going to take them as an authority over English dances?). Does anyone have a convincing and authoritative spelling? ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 08:56:07 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 10:54:27 -0600 From: "M.G. Mudrey, Jr." Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: "Dance Angels": Who Awards the Halos? and: Excessive Embellishments.. To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20020301104813.00ac3e80-AT- mail.mhtc.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_CRjn2xkb5evgr9xmkpAiVg)" --Boundary_(ID_CRjn2xkb5evgr9xmkpAiVg) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT At 11:43 AM 3/1/02 -0500, you wrote: Susan Booker,in Lexington, KY I agree, I agree I agree!!! 1. In a walk through I always use school figures with no embellishments,...in contra I do one turn of a swing and wait....I tell my partner that this is a walk through, not a dance, save your energy. 2. In contra...until I know my partner or opposite, I use school figures....embellishments work only when BOTH parties are comfortable. 3. I wear a brace, bandage, etc. or tell my partner/opposite that NO! if I have an injury. It usually works. I try to respect the physical limitation of my dancer partners if known.... It is the caller's/teacher's responsiblity to emphasize to the dancer polite behavior. Many dancers have never been told or LECTURED to about what is proper dance behavior. Thank your partner, thank the band, escort your partner to the side, in ballroom waltz in the dance-line-of-direction, not retrograde!.... mm (crabby sometimes for what it is worth). Please send me an email if you wish to be moved from this mail notification list "Mike - remove me from MECD" Madison Wisconsin English Country Dancing The Madison (Wisconsin) English Country Dance Society meets on the first and third Mondays of the month from 7:30-9:30 PM. Dancing October through May at the Wilmar Center, 953 Jenifer St., Madison, Wisconsin June through September in front of Memorial Library, University of Wisconsin-Madison, For more information, contact Mike (mgmudrey-AT- mhtc.net), Jean (608-231-1040) or Don (608-238-9951) Website images http://sprott.physics.wisc.edu/mecds/home.htm no images http://sprott.physics.wisc.edu/mecds/hometext.htm --Boundary_(ID_CRjn2xkb5evgr9xmkpAiVg) Content-type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT At 11:43 AM 3/1/02 -0500, you wrote:
Susan Booker,in Lexington, KY
I agree, I agree I agree!!!

1. In a walk through I always use school figures with no embellishments,...in contra I do one turn of a swing and wait....I tell my partner that this is a walk through, not a dance, save your energy.

2. In contra...until I know my partner or opposite, I use school figures....embellishments work only when BOTH parties are comfortable.

3. I wear a brace, bandage, etc. or tell my partner/opposite that NO! if I have an injury.  It usually works.  I try to respect the physical limitation of my dancer partners if known....

It is the caller's/teacher's responsiblity to emphasize to the dancer polite behavior.  Many dancers have never been told or LECTURED to about what is proper dance behavior.  Thank your partner, thank the band, escort your partner to the side, in ballroom waltz in the dance-line-of-direction, not retrograde!....

mm (crabby sometimes for what it is worth).


Please send me an email if you wish to be moved from this mail notification list
        "Mike - remove me from MECD"<mgmudrey-AT- mhtc.net>

Madison Wisconsin English Country Dancing

The Madison (Wisconsin) English Country Dance Society meets
on the first and third Mondays of the month from 7:30-9:30 PM.
 
Dancing
        October through May at the Wilmar Center,
                953 Jenifer St., Madison, Wisconsin
        June through September in front of Memorial Library,
                University of Wisconsin-Madison,
For more information, contact
        Mike (mgmudrey-AT- mhtc.net),
        Jean (608-231-1040) or
        Don (608-238-9951)
Website
images
http://sprott.physics.wisc.edu/mecds/home.htm
no images
http://sprott.physics.wisc.edu/mecds/hometext.htm
--Boundary_(ID_CRjn2xkb5evgr9xmkpAiVg)-- ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 09:53:52 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 09:56:49 -0800 From: Norman Bradley Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: RE: Dargason & Holst To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Allison, Solving this problem is quite easy, it's done *all* of the time. Simply dance 5 or more or less steps for each 4 beats of the music . We, the Merrie Pryanksters, danced Dargason with 10 couples on a street in Berkeley (California) *once*. We placed the band at the middle of the set and had spotters at the ends to tell everybody when to turn around and start back. Norman Bradley > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ecd-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU On Behalf Of Allison M > Thompson > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 5:04 AM > To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU > Subject: Re: Dargason & Holst > > > For what it's worth, I counted the reps on the HOlst version once while > driving (almost as bad as talking on a cell phone) and got up to > something wierd like 29 or 31. I'm not sure how this could be divisible > into the dance... > > Allison > > > ________________________________________________________________ > GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! > Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! > Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: > http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/. > > ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 11:07:34 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 19:18:23 +0000 From: Ann Higley Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: No twirling please. To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <002301c1c155$f48ac2c0$5eb6883e-AT- annhigle> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT References: <004c01c1c140$30ca0c20$2602ffd1-AT- oemcomputer> Susan Booker wrote - How does a > dancer with a slight limitation notify them without seeming to be accusatory > or portraying herself as a frail flower? Well I know of a lady who has a problem with giddyness, so to prevent other dancers twirling her, she had a nice bright badge made which read something like 'no twirling please' which she always wore to dances. I think she found this worked quite well. I'm not sure it would stop the person who didn't notice you were wearing a sling though..... Best wishes Ann ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 11:37:57 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 11:37:46 -0800 (PST) From: Lyrl Catherine Ahern Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: *John Tallis's Canon* To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <20020301193746.2216.qmail-AT- web13804.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT --- Campbell_Kaynor-AT- biogen.com wrote: > To build on the comments by Andy on JTC, here are some of > my thoughts: > [I think this was originally Emily Ferguson, not Andy]: > > 3. Turning single there risks physically running in to > > the person progressing in the other direction > > Besides his well thought out points, I have encouraged > dancers in crowded corners to TS at this point precisely > so that they do NOT collide with the 2nd corners (or as > often happens, precede them by crossing behind rather > than in front of the retreating 2nd corners). There has not been any mention one way or the other that I an remember whether the TS is moving forward or stationary. Which? Lyrl __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - Send FREE e-cards for every occasion! http://greetings.yahoo.com ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 11:54:05 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 14:53:38 -0500 From: Campbell_Kaynor-AT- biogen.com Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: *John Tallis's Canon* To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Lyrl, Correct - I was copying Emily's words and responding to Andy's comments with some of my own. I teach the TS as what I think you are calling stationary. As corners #2 are backing straight out from the set, the 1st corners turn over the right shoulder passing through the starting position and perhaps a step beyond, into a luxurious forward and back with their new corners. Since the same problem of cramped quarters applies to the 2nd corners, they do the same but 4 counts later. (Of course if one is dancing in a normal size room with only one set of dancers, the problems of cramped space are not an issue and I teach it as PS wrote it. All this turning applies only when you lack space to take four liberal steps back (without ending in the neighboring set) and when the sets are tight in the lengthwise dimension as well. The deciding factor is whether dancers have room to take eight steps in the diagonal direction and still be face-to-face with the new corner. Cammy ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 15:25:25 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 15:11:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan Winston - SSRL Central Computing Subject: Re: How do you spell chassay? To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Message-ID: <01KEUNF267MM9G7QPT-AT- SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT References: <199902010310.TAA07396-AT- m9.sprynet.com> Hugh wrote: > Someone asked me to proof-read a book of dances he is about > to print, and I was worried about the spelling of the word chassay. > My dictionary only allows me c h a s s e-acute (I'm not risking > non-USASCII characters!), as does Webster > The CDMs use chassay. Sets in Order use sashay (but then we > all know that they can't even spell do si do so who's going to take > them as an authority over English dances?). > Does anyone have a convincing and authoritative spelling? No, but I'll indulge myself in an opinion, anyway. I am not convinced that "chasse" or "chassay" is a helpful or necessary piece of vocabulary except where it has no synonym. (Where it's used to mean "step - and - close" in waltz time, as in "Margaret's Waltz", it's worthwhile.) Otherwise, it appears to mean "skip-change" or "slip" or "gallop". If these aren't American dances, forget sashay. If I were copy-editing - not just proofreading - I'd suggest to the author that the problematic word be replaced with "skip-change" if that's what's meant, "slip" if that's what's meant, and rendered as c h a s s e-acute (just my personal preference) if that's what's meant. -- Alan =============================================================================== Alan Winston --- WINSTON-AT- SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Disclaimer: I speak only for myself, not SLAC or SSRL Phone: 650/926-3056 Paper mail to: SSRL -- SLAC BIN 99, 2575 Sand Hill Rd, Menlo Park CA 94025 =============================================================================== ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 16:59:08 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 19:58:48 -0500 From: Diane Schmit Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: "Dance Angels": Who Awards the Halos? and: Excessive Embellishments.. To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT At 11:43 AM 3/1/02 , you wrote: Obviously, I always >tell my partners that I have a problem with the left shoulder, and they are >usually considerate about it. But what about others in the set? How does a >dancer with a slight limitation notify them without seeming to be accusatory >or portraying herself as a frail flower? And it's the badly done ruffles and >flourishes that cause the problems... > I remember a dancer at Pinewoods many years ago wearing an attractively made little sign (colorful, scalloped edges) pinned near her shoulder requesting dancers to be considerate of her arm/shoulder. It served as a little reminder every time you met her in a dance, and it seemed to work well for her. I don't remember the nice wording she used, but I do remember it being creative and pleasantly worded. And, she didn't have to keep verbalizing it to her partners. Diane Diane Schmit dschmit-AT- ix.netcom.com ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 21:00:07 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 20:59:58 -0800 (PST) From: Andrew Peterson Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: *John Tallis's Canon* To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <20020302045958.38281.qmail-AT- web20008.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT --- Lyrl Catherine Ahern wrote: > There has not been any mention one way or the other that I > an remember whether the TS is moving forward or stationary. > Which? I move forward in a loop, slightly into the set and then to the right around the person next to me who is backing out (not meaning that I go all the way around them, just curving so that I avoid them), ending up facing on the diagonal in progressed place and ready to go forward to my new corner. Andy __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - sign up for Fantasy Baseball http://sports.yahoo.com ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 22:15:15 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 22:15:05 -0800 (PST) From: Andrew Peterson Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: "Dance Angels": Who Awards the Halos? and: Excessive Embellishments.. To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <20020302061505.59515.qmail-AT- web20006.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT --- SUSAN B BOOKER wrote: > I really like the idea of "dance angels" - but how are they to > be determined? Often, especially at "contemporary" contra > dances (as well as some local ECDs), I've seen dancers with > only a couple of months of experience, or"perpetual beginners" > assume that they are experts. While their willingness to help > even more rank beginners is commendable, the results often > leave much to be desired, and badly learned practices spread. There are times when I see this and I want to go over and rescue the person being "helped", but I'm not sure how to do it politely. It's been especially noticable to me recently where two particular people at Scandinavian are concerned. He's not nearly as good a dancer as he thinks he is, and I don't want him teaching this particular woman bad habits because after only a few months of dancing she is already better at the dances she knows than he is. > ...And weekend dances often have a very different group of > dancers than do the (typically) week-night sessions, which in > my area, are more devoted to learning and practice...whereas > many of the offending weekenders show up once every month or > so, and show little interest in weeknight events There are people who _never_ come to the teaching period to learn new dances, then try to learn turning dances by imitation as though they were doing Balkan line dances. I always feel sorry for their partners who are being dragged around the room and don't look like theya re enjoying themselves in the least. > I quite agree with Andy's points about unnecessary and > annoying "embellishments"- it seems that newcomers pick up on > the ruffles and flourishes well before they acquire the basics, > probably because the "extras" are showy and eye-catching. I have to admit to putting in my own favorite flourishes sometimes, but I also am very aware of my space and don't dance with my feet flying out into other people's space. There are people who are badly out of control even when they _aren't_ doing anything fancy. Those are the ones who are most dangerous. When waltzing, I'm one of the most predictable people on the floor and if someone is looking it's easy to know where I'm going, but the other night some guy backed his partner straight out toward the wall and between my feet and she tripped me. I didn't quite hit the floor, but hurt myself trying to stay upright and not drag my partner down with me. Being rather petite, she told me that she'd just learned that she can't keep me from falling. > With a tricky left shoulder, I avoid dance venues where I know > I'll be unwillingly twirled and turned under by those whose > enthusiasm exceeds their expertise. One of my friends has a fairly severe case of scholiosis and she's had to stop dancing because every time she does someone jerks her around and throws her back out. Whereas "normal" people have some flexibility the length of their back, her upper back is fairly rigid and the lower back has to absorb all of the twisting. > Yes, Genny also told me to "Resist!", but sometimes it's not > possible, when a dancer is physically stronger and insistent > (and completely in his own world, and showing no regard for his > partner or others on the dance floor). I fault the callers'teachers for not teaching people to respect those around them and avoid injuring them. > Obviously, I always tell my partners that I have a problem with > the left shoulder, and they are usually considerate about it. > But what about others in the set? How does a dancer with a > slight limitation notify them without seeming to be accusatory > or portraying herself as a frail flower? And it's the badly > done ruffles and flourishes that cause the problems... If they were taught proper etiquette, they wouldn't even have to be told. I remember a week at Brasstown some years ago at which Brad Foster requested at the beginning of the first day's Contra class that he would like to see good solid basic dancing and not a lot of fancy flourishes. I don't think that anyone there could say that they didn't have a good time that week because of his request. Good solid basic dancing is a lot of fun. > I've even had a corner try to turn me under (by the left arm) > when I was wearing a sling. ...Such obliviousness isn't > confined to newcomers, of course...and is a related but > separate issue. The newcomers are often less likely to do harm than the oblivious oaf who thinks he knows it all. As my friend Marty and I have concluded long ago, there are three kinds of dancers. There are the beginners who are forgiven their sins because they're new to this and haven't had time to learn differently. There are the good dancers who really _do_ know what they are doing and pay attention to what's going on around them. And there are the perpetual beginners, for whom there is no excuse. Andy in PDX OR __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - sign up for Fantasy Baseball http://sports.yahoo.com ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2002 02:27:04 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2002 10:25:15 +0000 From: Michael Barraclough Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: RE: Arrangements for 2-couple dances To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <000201c1c1d4$8b8a2ac0$2d247ad5-AT- michael> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Andrew Peterson wrote "Reel Nutmeg had a dance that we did as comic relief that was called "Pickadilla" or "The New Bo-peep", which is in one of Sharp's country dance books. It is a longways for as many as will, non-progressive. I can't recall now if you only interacted with your partner or if it was a duple minor. New Bo-Peep was published in the 1st edn (1651) of the Dancing Master and was include in all editions of the first volume. Although described as longways for as many as will, which normally implies a progression, there is no progression. Each dancer only interacts with their partner with the chorus figure being the same for each of the three standard figures excepting that the chorus is started alternately by the men first time and women second time etc. Michael Barraclough http://www.mab.tgis.co.uk ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2002 08:09:02 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2002 10:04:48 -0500 From: Joyce Crouch Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Across the Atlantic 2002, Amherst, MA, USA To: ECD List Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Dear ECD List Friends, This is an "early alert" for any interested people to mark your calendars for another world-class dancing weekend in beautiful Amherst, Massachusetts, to be held Sept 21-22, 2002. More details will come later, but the basics are in place. Once again we will have as our leaders the internationally renowned (& locally beloved/admired) Philippe Callens of Belgium and Brad Foster of the United States. Music will be provided by New Englanders (transplanted if not native) Karen Axelrod, Doug Creighton, Joyce Crouch, Mary Lea, and Chris Rua. We will dance in two great dance halls with superb wood floors, Munson Library in Amherst and the spacious Guiding Star Grange in nearby Greenfield. Special notice: Previous attendees will be pleased to learn that this time around we definitely do *not* plan to include the mosquitoes &/or the 90-degree temperatures that accompanied the fun of the June 2001 Across the Atlantic weekend! :) Instead, we are confidently predicting cool-ish temperatures, no bugs, and beautiful fall foliage typical of late September in western Massachusetts. Hope many of you can join us for Across the Atlantic 2002! Joyce Crouch ----------------------------------------------------------------- NEW PERMANENT EMAIL ADDRESS ****** joycecrouch-AT- pobox.com ***** ----------------------------------------------------------------- Joyce B Crouch Telephone: 413-549-4123 95 Pulpit Hill Road Fax: 413-549-7096 Amherst MA 01002 email: joycecrouch-AT- pobox.com ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2002 11:01:37 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2002 13:55:48 -0500 From: sol weber Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Contrasts. Subtitle:The two Mr. Carters To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <20020303.135555.-4078307.12.solweber-AT- juno.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT I did get hold of that great Sydney Carter poem, "Man with a Microphone", and what a contrast with the story in today's NY Times re the strenuous efforts to locate and reward that other Mr Carter (James) connected to that surprising and delightful Grammy sweep for the "O Brother" soundtrack album. The Times described the music business as .....an industry rampant with tales of swindled royalties, corruption and stolen song credits..... Thankfully, that's not always the case. Anyone wanting copies of both, let me know OFF LIST, at solweber-AT- juno.com +++++Sol "Roundman" Weber --- "So many rounds, so little time" +++++25-14 37th St, Astoria, NY 11103; 718-278-4389 (after 11am) ++SINGERS and musicians, contact me for info on books, albums, and misc musical fun; solweber-AT- JUNO.com ; web -- roundz.tripod.com Urgent message? Please phone. ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2002 13:44:21 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2002 15:47:08 -0500 From: Gene Murrow Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Let Beginners Choose a Dance Angel To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <20020303.163243.-827199.2.gmurrow-AT- juno.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT On Thu, 28 Feb 2002 15:06:29 -0500 (EST) DavBarnert-AT- aol.com writes: > Don Bell wrote: > > >"Dance angels" (I'm not sure who first coined the phrase) > > My guess is Gene Murrow. > > Gene? Well, for the historical record (which no doubt will be Alan's archive of this list-- if only John Playford had hosted a listserve!)... I might be able to take the responsibility/blame for first use of the term "dance angels" in an official printed ECD-related document. It was when I was Director of Early Music Week at Pinewoods in the early 90's and I wanted to encourage some experienced dancers to join the daily class for beginners. I wrote letters to several folks who I thought would be suitable (addressing another recent thread about who chooses), inviting them to volunteer. We then scheduled each angel for no more than a couple of classes during the week so they could also dance with their experienced peers. I had floated the concept with a couple of EMW regulars-- Gina Jenkins and Tom Anastasio of College Park, MD, and the term grew out of our discussions. Perhaps they invented it, or had heard it before, or I invented it, or we invented it as a group, or it came to us from above via a dove alighting on my shoulder, or... Gene ------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Permanent address: - for your Address book ISP of the moment: - "Reply" button destination ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2002 16:55:06 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Return-Path: Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2002 19:59:25 -0500 From: Ridge Kennedy Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: RE: Let Beginners Choose a Dance Angel To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT "Dance Angel" is a helpful term that has been around in Modern Western Square Dancing for decades. In that context, refers to the experienced dancers who attend MWSD lessons in order to fill out squares and demonstrate for the teachers. R. Ridge Kennedy Washington, NJ [No Exit] When you stumble, make it part of the dance. ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2002 22:27:48 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2002 22:26:34 -0800 From: Chris Sackett & Brooke Friendly Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Canon-ades (sic!) To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <3C831394.E71A421C-AT- opendoor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; x-mac-creator=4D4F5353; x-mac-type=54455854; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT References: Been there - ouch Also was at a dance once when the musicians spontaneously decided about 3 times through the dance to start playing it as a round - it resulted in chaos. Brooke Friendly in Ashland OR Graham.Christian-AT- risk.sungard.com wrote: > I am rather scrupulous in saying when teaching "Christchurch Bells," > (tho' I like to talk about the tune) DON'T sing along, it'll just end in > tears. ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2002 22:31:50 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 00:31:39 -0600 From: Roger Diggle Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Excessive Embellishments... To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <20020304063139.EYQB5791.chruser-AT- [66.222.32.73]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Susan Booker wrote: > ... With a tricky left shoulder, I avoid >dance venues where I know I'll be unwillingly twirled and turned under by >those whose enthusiasm exceeds their expertise. Yes, Genny also told me to >"Resist!", but sometimes it's not possible, when a dancer is physically >stronger and insistent (and completely in his own world, and showing no >regard for his partner or others on the dance floor). Obviously, I always >tell my partners that I have a problem with the left shoulder, and they are >usually considerate about it. But what about others in the set? How does a >dancer with a slight limitation notify them without seeming to be accusatory >or portraying herself as a frail flower? And it's the badly done ruffles and >flourishes that cause the problems... >Solving this one is beyond me, however..although tactful words from >experienced dancers and callers; generally addressed to those who >unknowingly err may be of some use to those who are willing to listen and >learn. Other suggestions? I agree... there's a lot that experienced dancers and callers can say and do to show this sort of leadership. Unfortunately, it happens too rarely. Many of the aforementioned ruffles and flourishes are supplied by the "experienced" dancers. And, more and more, callers are teaching less and less -- often because "experienced" dancers, who don't think they need the teaching, give the callers a hard time when they teach. I'd like to encourage callers to resist the temptation to comply with the wishes of those who think teaching isn't necessary. This is not to say that such teaching can be inefficient or humorless. Dance leaders oughta be prepared to teach, then do it. Teaching and encouraging use of the basics and good etiquette will go a long way. And an important piece of that etiquette is the seeking of agreement between dancers about flourishes before they erupt. There's also room for the organizers of the dance to take responsibility for the atmosphere on the dance floor. Callers who are not local don't know the personalities or chronic problems of a group they are visiting. The organizers can apprise the callers and enlist their help. Interestingly, dancers are often more willing to listen to teaching from an out-of-town caller than from their local callers. Organizers also need to be willing to make some ruffles of their own when necessary... that is, to show a willingness to take a problem dancer aside and ask (or tell, if necessary) that local expectations of etiquette be respected. It's my experience that this happens only rarely. It's also legitimate for a dancer who feels they've been abused to talk personally to the dancer who executed the rough maneuver. Many dancers, of course, don't feel comfortable in that role. I believe it's ultimately up to the organizers when complaints arise. None of this talk needs to be unkind. It's possible to be direct about such matters without chewing someone's head off. Andrew Peterson wrote: > ... I fault the callers'teachers for not teaching > people to respect those around them and avoid injuring > them. As above, I agree. > ... And there are the perpetual beginners, for whom > there is no excuse. I generally disagree. A lot of "perpetual beginners" are, frankly, learning disabled with regard to dance. Many are doing the best they can -- unfortunately, not very well. I see contra dancing as democratic dancing, and I'd like to see it stay that way. Fortunately and unfortunately, that means accepting some individuals who have poor natural ability. On the other hand, there are those who simply don't choose to learn or concentrate on participating as a member of the group of dancers. Those folks are candidates for a conversation about the importance of respecting the dancers around them, just as are those who endanger others. Roger Diggle ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 03:55:27 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 07:01:39 -0500 From: Don Bell Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: "Dance Angels": Let Beginners Award the Halos To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <5.0.0.25.2.20020304060950.01ed5eb0-AT- pop.nycap.rr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_IORXkTEdJX3OJ1uyH9HTMA)" --Boundary_(ID_IORXkTEdJX3OJ1uyH9HTMA) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT At 10:15 PM 3/1/02 -0800, you wrote: >--- SUSAN B BOOKER wrote: > > I really like the idea of "dance angels" - but how are they to > > be determined? Often, especially at "contemporary" contra > > dances (as well as some local ECDs), I've seen dancers with > > only a couple of months of experience, or"perpetual beginners" > > assume that they are experts. While their willingness to help > > even more rank beginners is commendable, the results often > > leave much to be desired, and badly learned practices spread. Helping beginners avoid dance angel imposters is definitely a problem. The only almost fail-safe solution is micro-managing the encounter, i.e. pre-selecting angels before the dance and giving them their stealth assignment. In many situations this strategy may be difficult to implement (e.g. dependent on having a large enough group of dance angels you can count on). If dance angel imposters select beginners, this could be a continuing problem. However, if beginners select dance angels, after a few tries they get much better at selecting real dance angels and avoiding imposters. Another advantage to letting beginners choose is that it reinforces the habit of choosing, giving them the feeling that they have some control over their enjoyment of the dance evening, that they can choose to dance with some of the better dancers and that those dancers are usually willing to dance with them. Don --Boundary_(ID_IORXkTEdJX3OJ1uyH9HTMA) Content-type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT At 10:15 PM 3/1/02 -0800, you wrote:

--- SUSAN B BOOKER <susantiq-AT- prodigy.net> wrote:
> I really like the idea of "dance angels" - but how are they to
> be determined? Often, especially at "contemporary" contra
> dances (as well as some local ECDs), I've seen dancers with
> only a couple of months of experience, or"perpetual beginners"
>  assume that they are experts. While their willingness to help
> even more rank beginners is commendable, the results often
> leave much to be desired, and badly learned practices spread.

Helping beginners avoid dance angel imposters is definitely a problem.

The only almost fail-safe solution is micro-managing the encounter, i.e. pre-selecting angels before the dance and giving them their stealth assignment. In many situations this strategy may be difficult to implement (e.g. dependent on having a large enough group of dance angels you can count on).

If dance angel imposters select beginners, this could be a continuing problem. However, if beginners select dance angels, after a few tries they get much  better at selecting real dance angels and avoiding imposters. Another advantage to letting beginners choose is that it reinforces the habit of choosing, giving them the feeling that they have some control over their enjoyment of the dance evening, that they can choose to dance with some of the better dancers and that those dancers are usually willing to dance with them. 

Don


--Boundary_(ID_IORXkTEdJX3OJ1uyH9HTMA)-- ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 06:58:27 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 09:38:45 -0500 From: Gene Murrow Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Let Beginners Choose a Dance Angel To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <20020304.093853.-827199.4.gmurrow-AT- juno.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT On Sun, 03 Mar 2002 15:47:08 -0500 Gene Murrow writes: > ... or it [the term "dance angels"] came to us from above via a dove alighting on my shoulder, or... > On Sun, 03 Mar 2002 19:59:25 -0500 Ridge Kennedy writes: > "Dance Angel" is a helpful term that has been around in Modern Western Square Dancing for decades. I _thought_ that bird looked a little silly with the calico dress and all the petticoats :-) Gene ------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Permanent address: - for your Address book ISP of the moment: - "Reply" button destination ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 09:12:22 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 11:15:52 -0600 From: Paul Stamler Subject: Re: "Dance Angels": Let Beginners Award the Halos To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Message-ID: <000f01c1c3a0$3e0b5bc0$fc2a4b0c-AT- paulstam> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT References: <5.0.0.25.2.20020304060950.01ed5eb0-AT- pop.nycap.rr.com> ----- Original Message ----- From: Don Bell <> The only problem with that, in my experience, is that the beginners seldom figure out that the person they're dancing with is inept; they think it's their own fault. They may not last long enough to learn to select the real angels unless the organizers keep an eagle eye out. Peace, Paul ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 11:14:12 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 11:14:01 -0800 (PST) From: Lyrl Catherine Ahern Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Excessive Embellishments... To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <20020304191401.26488.qmail-AT- web13801.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT --- Roger Diggle wrote: > Interestingly, dancers are often more willing to listen > to teaching from an out-of-town caller than from their > local callers. Reminds me of kids--kids may not obey Mom, but let someone outside the family tell them the same darn thing and they straighten right up. Are we reliving our childhoods? Lyrl Acton MA __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - sign up for Fantasy Baseball http://sports.yahoo.com ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 22:54:22 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 22:54:12 -0800 (PST) From: Andrew Peterson Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Excessive Embellishments... To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <20020305065412.53127.qmail-AT- web20010.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT > --- Roger Diggle wrote: > > Interestingly, dancers are often more willing to listen > > to teaching from an out-of-town caller than from their > > local callers. > --- Lyrl Catherine Ahern wrote: > Reminds me of kids--kids may not obey Mom, but let someone > outside the family tell them the same darn thing and they > straighten right up. Are we reliving our childhoods? And here I was under the illusion that I'd never left it... Andy __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/ ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 10:24:18 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 13:22:22 -0500 From: Michael Bergman Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: a few spaces left at the Jane Austen Ball in CT To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Forwarded for a friend: > Dear Friends: > By the way, for those of you who have not bought your tickets for March > 9th - there are only a few left. Please note, tickets will not be > available at the door!! > > For those of you that have forgotten about March 9th - take a peek at: > > http://jasnact.tripod.com/aball.html > > and then hurry up and buy a ticket. It should be a great evening. > > Regards, > > Marc ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 12:21:44 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 12:22:50 -0800 From: Lizbeth Langston Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Upcoming SDHS conference, June 2002 To: Rendance , ECD Message-ID: <3C85291A.5DEA5A9D-AT- citrus.ucr.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Colleagues and Friends, The organizers of this year's conference are particularly interested in reaching out to people with a wide range of interests--not just academic scholars. Please excuse cross-postings. Lizbeth Langston (with her hat on as an SDHS Board member) *********************************** DANCE & THE CITY: URBAN AND URBANE Society of Dance History Scholars 2002 International Conference Scholarly papers, panels, plenary sessions, round tables, lecture-demonstrations, and workshops on a broad spectrum of dance manifestations as they intersect with the human choreography of the city Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, June 20-23, 2002 SPECIAL EVENTS Argentine Tango Milonga a tango dance party at the opening night reception with Kelly Ray & Lesley Mitchell Temple Dance Faculty Concert choreographies and historical reconstructions by Kariamu Welsh Asante, Philip Grosser, and Sprezzatura Rennie Harris PureMovement Illadelph Legends: Honoring the Source performances during and masterclasses after the conference Dance & the City Videotape Arcade an exhibition of Greater Philadelphia dancers and dance companies Locating the History of Philadelphia Dance a virtual exhibition from the Philadelphia Dance Archive Project The chance to make a difference in six working groups: Dance History Teachers, Early Dance, Ethnicity and Dance, Reconstruction, Strategies for Doctoral Education, and Students in SDHS and MUCH, MUCH MORE Do what you've always wanted to do: visit the historic City of Philadephia and savor the delights of dance history in one memorable journey. Mark your calendars June 20-23: Philadelphia, USA! See our Web site at www.sdhs.org for more information. A brochure on the conference will be coming out in March. Joellen Meglin Chair, Local Planning Committee Dr. Joellen Meglin Associate Professor of Dance Department of Dance Temple University Philadelphia, PA 19122 jmeglin-AT- nimbus.ocis.temple.edu (215) 204-6284 FAX (215) 204-4347 ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 08:46:37 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 11:45:27 -0500 From: SUSAN B BOOKER Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: "Washington Post" article: "Costume Drama" To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <007501c1c52e$53009880$3646fcd1-AT- oemcomputer> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT I just discovered a very interesting - and relevant - online article from the February 22 "Washington Post". It concerns historic reenactors, and includes a number of anecdotes about and references to English country dancing. I'm not sure how long it will remain online, so catch it while you can. Did those of you in the D.C. area gain any new dancers as a result of this article?Unfortunately, it doesn't contain any direct references to area dance groups, other than to a May 11 workshop, evidently sponsored by the Living History Foundation. Susan Booker Lexington, KY ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 08:50:29 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 11:49:19 -0500 From: SUSAN B BOOKER Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: URL for "Costume Drama" article To: ecd-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <000701c1c52e$dd0f00c0$3646fcd1-AT- oemcomputer> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Oops, forgot to include this in the previous message: http://www.wahsingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A45399-2002Feb21.html Susan Booker Lexington, KY ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 08:53:02 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 11:51:52 -0500 From: SUSAN B BOOKER Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: "Costume Drama" one more try... To: ecd-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <000f01c1c52f$385df120$3646fcd1-AT- oemcomputer> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Make that: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A45399-2002Feb21.html Trusting I got it right this time, Susan Booker Lexington, KY ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 08:57:15 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 11:57:05 -0500 From: Deb Karl Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: URL for "Costume Drama" article To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <3C864A60.FBA20AA6-AT- wi.mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT References: <000701c1c52e$dd0f00c0$3646fcd1-AT- oemcomputer> it's available for free for another day or two....14 days from publication before it goes into archives... need to spell "washington" correctly in Susan's URL, or go to www.washingtonpost.com, enter "Costume Drama" in the site search box in the upper righthand corner, then select the article. --Deb SUSAN B BOOKER wrote: > > Oops, forgot to include this in the previous message: > > http://www.wahsingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A45399-2002Feb21.html > > Susan Booker > Lexington, KY ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 10:36:13 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 13:35:55 -0500 (EST) From: Dfhart24-AT- aol.com Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: URL for "Costume Drama" article To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <16f.9e45b0f.29b7bb8b-AT- aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_jn/AADcmKf4cYTUd3JhlJw)" --Boundary_(ID_jn/AADcmKf4cYTUd3JhlJw) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT In a message dated 3/6/2002 11:52:00 AM Eastern Standard Time, susantiq-AT- prodigy.net writes: > http://www.wahsingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A45399-2002Feb21.html > > Couldn't get this to work. Any suggestions? - d --Boundary_(ID_jn/AADcmKf4cYTUd3JhlJw) Content-type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT In a message dated 3/6/2002 11:52:00 AM Eastern Standard Time, susantiq-AT- prodigy.net writes:


http://www.wahsingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A45399-2002Feb21.html



Couldn't get this to work.  Any suggestions? - d
--Boundary_(ID_jn/AADcmKf4cYTUd3JhlJw)-- ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 10:45:17 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 13:36:09 -0500 (EST) From: "Roger W. Broseus" Subject: Re: URL for 'Costume Drama' article To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Message-ID: <45432.148.184.176.32.1015439769.squirrel-AT- www.weitzman.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT References: <16f.9e45b0f.29b7bb8b-AT- aol.com> > In a message dated 3/6/2002 11:52:00 AM Eastern Standard Time, >susantiq-AT- prodigy.net writes: > > >> http://www.wahsingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A45399-2002Feb21.html >> >> > > Couldn't get this to work. Any suggestions? - d Yeah: I'll zap a copy to ya. -- Roger W. Broseus ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 08:46:11 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 16:44:16 +0000 From: Michael Barraclough Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Michael Barraclough Interpretations To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <000001c1c5f7$52dd18a0$ecad7ad5-AT- michael> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Added this week at http://www.mab.tgis.co.uk/michael/notations.html =============== New Bo Peep/Piccadilly – The Dancing Master 1st Edn Nonesuch – The Dancing Master 1st Edn New Bo Peep is a longways for as many as will which can be done by as few as one couples! The interpretation of Nonesuch differs significantly from that published by Cecil Sharp. Next dances for uploading: ========================= Black/Galloping Nag Cold and Raw Jamaica Please feel free to use my interpretations but note that the material is copyright and cannot be reproduced elsewhere without permission. There is no charge for use, but I would appreciate an email to let me know how it went and what people thought of it (good or bad comments equally welcome). Please email me off list if you need any clarification or if you have any requests for specific dance interpretations. Michael Barraclough http://www.mab.tgis.co.uk/ Previous additions: ================== The Bishop - Thompson, Twenty Four Country Dances for the year 1778 Cuckolds All A Row - The [English] Dancing Master 1st edn, 1651 Excuse Me - William Woolball's notebook, 1719 Lilliburlero - The Dancing Master 8th Edn, 1690 ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 16:34:58 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 16:40:20 -0800 From: Paul / Victoria Bestock Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: sources To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.1.20020307163901.00a24240-AT- mail.oz.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT >Hi Sharon. I asked Mary if it was OK to send you Halsway Manners and she said she already faxed you a copy. Did you get it? If not, I 'll send you one. Victoria Bestock ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 19:53:51 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 22:53:35 -0500 (EST) From: SFORDNYC-AT- aol.com Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: RE: CDNY's Farewell for Sharon, David & Michael -- May 19th To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <116.d7323c8.29b98fc0-AT- aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Dear ECD Friends: We at CDNY are still in denial -- but we must come to grips with the fact that Sharon, David and Michael are really and truly leaving NYC and returning to the Bay Area from whence they came lo these many years. So there's nothing else to do but throw a party and send them off in fine style. Please join us for CDNY's Farewell Blowout Hoohah for Sharon, David and Michael Sunday, May 19th from 3 to 8 p.m. Congregation Beth Elohim, Park Slope, Brooklyn There will be A Cavalcade of Callers A Mass of Musicians A Potluck Feast The Dearly Departing (Sharon, David & Michael) And YOU! If you would like to join the callers, please contact Beverly Francis directly at bhfrancis-AT- aol.com If you would like to join the musicians, please contact Cynthia Simonoff directly at cynthiashaw-AT- mindspring.com. For your food offerings -- appetizer, salad, main dish, dessert -- and any other questions, please contact me directly at sfordnyc-AT- aol.com. Please do NOT contact Sharon directly for details about this event. Believe it or not, she is not organizing it in any way shape or form -- she's the guest! And she has quite enough to do with renovating their house. A REMINDER: To contact directly, paste the desired email address into a new message -- do not Reply to this one. We look forward to seeing you! Suzanne Ford CDNY ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 20:04:06 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 23:03:48 -0500 (EST) From: SFORDNYC-AT- aol.com Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: RE: Come to NYC for the Weekend -- May 18 & 19 To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <94.229b5a19.29b99224-AT- aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT If you're considering coming in for the Farwell Blowout Hoohah -- make a weekend of it! Country Dancers of Westchester is having a special dance on Saturday May 18th featuring Philippe Callens. It's at their usual location -- the Church of Highlands in White Plains -- 40 minutes or so north of Manhattan. I don't have all the details at my finger tips (literally), but I'm sure someone from CDW will add to this notice. Hope to see you! Suzanne ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 08:25:20 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 11:23:38 -0500 (EST) From: "Susan R. Lorand" Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: RE: Come to NYC for the Weekend -- May 18 & 19 To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT On Thu, 7 Mar 2002 SFORDNYC-AT- aol.com wrote: > Country Dancers of Westchester is having a special dance on Saturday > May 18th featuring Philippe Callens. > > It's at their usual location -- the Church of Highlands in White > Plains -- 40 minutes or so north of Manhattan. > > I don't have all the details at my finger tips (literally), but I'm > sure someone from CDW will add to this notice. i can add a shameless advertisement of who the musicians will be: ellen tepper, robin russell, norma castle, and susie lorand. cheers, susie lorand princeton, nj, usa ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 12:15:53 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 15:15:34 -0500 (EST) From: Clwread-AT- aol.com Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: CDNY's Farewell for Sharon, David & Michael -- May 19th To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <57.7c3e06f.29ba75e6-AT- aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT << Dear ECD Friends: We at CDNY are still in denial -- but we must come to grips with the fact that Sharon, David and Michael are really and truly leaving NYC and returning to the Bay Area from whence they came lo these many years. So there's nothing else to do but throw a party and send them off in fine style. Please join us for CDNY's Farewell Blowout Hoohah for Sharon, David and Michael Sunday, May 19th from 3 to 8 p.m. Congregation Beth Elohim, Park Slope, Brooklyn There will be A Cavalcade of Callers A Mass of Musicians A Potluck Feast The Dearly Departing (Sharon, David & Michael) And YOU! If you would like to join the callers, please contact Beverly Francis directly at bhfrancis-AT- aol.com If you would like to join the musicians, please contact Cynthia Simonoff directly at cynthiashaw-AT- mindspring.com. For your food offerings -- appetizer, salad, main dish, dessert -- and any other questions, please contact me directly at sfordnyc-AT- aol.com. Please do NOT contact Sharon directly for details about this event. Believe it or not, she is not organizing it in any way shape or form -- she's the guest! And she has quite enough to do with renovating their house. A REMINDER: To contact directly, paste the desired email address into a new message -- do not Reply to this one. We look forward to seeing you! Suzanne Ford CDNY ----------------------- Headers -------------------------------- Return-Path: Received: from rly-xe04.mx.aol.com (rly-xe04.mail.aol.com [172.20.105.196]) by air-xe03.mail.aol.com (v83.45) with ESMTP id MAILINXE34-0307225511; Thu, 07 Mar 2002 22:55:11 -0500 Received: from smtp1.SLAC.Stanford.EDU (smtp1.slac.stanford.edu [134.79.18.82]) by rly-xe04.mx.aol.com (v83.45) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINXE48-0307225446; Thu, 07 Mar 2002 22:54:46 -0500 Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON.smtp1.slac.stanford.edu by smtp1.slac.stanford.edu (PMDF V6.1 #37665) id <0GSM00E01YTOA0-AT- smtp1.slac.stanford.edu>; Thu, 07 Mar 2002 19:53:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from ssrl04.slac.stanford.edu (SSRL04.SLAC.Stanford.EDU [134.79.33.14]) by smtp1.slac.stanford.edu (PMDF V6.1 #37665) with SMTP id <0GSM00C5HYTMUQ-AT- smtp1.slac.stanford.edu>; Thu, 07 Mar 2002 19:53:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 22:53:35 -0500 (EST) From: SFORDNYC-AT- aol.com Subject: RE: CDNY's Farewell for Sharon, David & Michael -- May 19th Sender: owner-ecd-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Errors-to: owner-ecd-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Warnings-to: <> Reply-to: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-id: <116.d7323c8.29b98fc0-AT- aol.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Listname: Discussion of modern and historical English Country Dance >> ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 15:03:57 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 15:03:43 -0800 (PST) From: Barbara Ruth Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Potential NOMAD dates To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <20020308230343.5737.qmail-AT- web13604.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT People have been asking about the next NOMAD date (annual fall festival in Newtown, Connecticut for those who don't already know). We just got the school schedule and the available dates for us are Oct 18-20, or Oct 25-27. The school would prefer us on Oct. 18-20. Would people on this list let me know about potential conflicts? This would include any major folk music or dance events, not just English. Thanks. Barbara ===== "There is no inverse relationship between freedom and security. Less of one does not lead to more of the other. People with no rights are not safe from terrorist attack." Molly Ivins __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/ ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 16:16:12 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 19:15:46 -0500 (EST) From: Dfhart24-AT- aol.com Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Potential NOMAD dates To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <72.18e2083f.29baae32-AT- aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_Y3Zbfin3EBn0p8ZnaBAacw)" --Boundary_(ID_Y3Zbfin3EBn0p8ZnaBAacw) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT In a message dated 3/8/2002 6:05:19 PM Eastern Standard Time, barbararuth-AT- rocketmail.com writes: > Oct 18-20, or Oct 25-27. The school would prefer us on Oct. 18-20. > > Would people on this list let me know about potential conflicts? > This would include any major folk music or dance events, not just > English The celebration of the 10th anniversary of the Pleasures of the Town/Amherst ECD is the 18th of October, so will probably involve and draw many. Deborah --Boundary_(ID_Y3Zbfin3EBn0p8ZnaBAacw) Content-type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT In a message dated 3/8/2002 6:05:19 PM Eastern Standard Time, barbararuth-AT- rocketmail.com writes:


Oct 18-20, or Oct 25-27.  The school would prefer us on Oct. 18-20.

Would people on this list let me know about potential conflicts?
This would include any major folk music or dance events, not just
English


The celebration of the 10th anniversary of the Pleasures of the Town/Amherst ECD is the 18th of October, so will probably involve and draw many.

Deborah
--Boundary_(ID_Y3Zbfin3EBn0p8ZnaBAacw)-- ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 16:37:17 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 16:35:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan Winston - SSRL Central Computing Subject: Re: Potential NOMAD dates To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Message-ID: <01KF4HYIZ18E9FSTHF-AT- SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Dfhart quoted: > barbararuth-AT- rocketmail.com writes: > > Oct 18-20, or Oct 25-27. The school would prefer us on Oct. 18-20. > > > > Would people on this list let me know about potential conflicts? > > This would include any major folk music or dance events, not just > > English and wrote > The celebration of the 10th anniversary of the Pleasures of the Town/Amherst > ECD is the 18th of October, so will probably involve and draw many. The BACDS Fall Dance Weekend will be the 18-20th. Luckily for us, it's already fully-staffed, so Nomad probably won't screw _us_ up. (Yes, it's 3000 miles away.) -- Alan =============================================================================== Alan Winston --- WINSTON-AT- SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Disclaimer: I speak only for myself, not SLAC or SSRL Phone: 650/926-3056 Paper mail to: SSRL -- SLAC BIN 99, 2575 Sand Hill Rd, Menlo Park CA 94025 =============================================================================== ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 21:19:37 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 00:19:21 -0500 (EST) From: CF1125-AT- aol.com Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Potential NOMAD dates To: barbararuth-AT- rocketmail.com, ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <144.ac48104.29baf559-AT- aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT In a message dated 3/8/02 11:05:19 PM, barbararuth-AT- rocketmail.com writes: << People have been asking about the next NOMAD date (annual fall festival in Newtown, Connecticut for those who don't already know). We just got the school schedule and the available dates for us are Oct 18-20, or Oct 25-27. The school would prefer us on Oct. 18-20. Would people on this list let me know about potential conflicts? This would include any major folk music or dance events, not just English. Thanks. Barbara >> The Baltimore Playford Ball will be Saturday, October 19, featuring music by The Flying Romanos. Carl Friedman ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 03:38:48 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 06:28:42 -0500 From: Ruth Feldberg Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: English Country Dance for Advanced Dancers - March 17, 2002 To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <3C89F1E8.BCF4F380-AT- javanet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT References: <20020227231253.94936.qmail-AT- web20004.mail.yahoo.com> ENGLISH COUNTRY DANCE FOR ADVANCED DANCERS Please join us Sunday, March 17, 2002 for a wonderful afternoon of dancing with experienced dancers. Complete familiarity with dance figures necessary. This event will take place at the Munson library in South Amherst, MA. Time is 2:00-5:00 PM. Admission $10 (includes refreshments) Calling by Brad Foster and musicians will be Earl Gaddis, Beth Murray and Chris Rua. For information, call Ruth at 413-253-3828 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Special bonus! Get another chance to enjoy Brad's calling by coming a day early to the Pleasures of the Town English Country Dance on Saturday, March 16, 8:00-11:00 PM at Munson. Musicians are Joyce Crouch, Doug Creigton and Chris Rua. Admission $7. ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 07:59:01 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 10:57:47 -0500 (EST) From: "Susan R. Lorand" Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Potential NOMAD dates To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Barbara Ruth wrote: > People have been asking about the next NOMAD date (annual fall > festival in Newtown, Connecticut for those who don't already know). > We just got the school schedule and the available dates for us are > Oct 18-20, or Oct 25-27. The school would prefer us on Oct. 18-20. > > Would people on this list let me know about potential conflicts? > This would include any major folk music or dance events, not just > English. rum & onions (the hallowe'en contra dance in princeton) is scheduled for saturday, october 26. cheers, susie lorand ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 08:58:02 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 16:57:49 +0000 From: Michael Serafin Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: 19th/Early 20th Century ECD To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU BCC: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Just out of curiousity, what was the status of ECD during the American Civil War and the British and American Victorian eras? Michael _________________________________________________________________ Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 09:17:04 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 11:55:22 -0500 From: sol weber Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: nomad dates To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <20020309.121041.-451397.0.solweber-AT- juno.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Re Barbara Ruth, and Nomad conflicts, The NY Pinewoods Folk Music Club will be having their Fall Weekend on Oct 18-20. +++++Sol "Roundman" Weber --- "So many rounds, so little time" +++++25-14 37th St, Astoria, NY 11103; 718-278-4389 (after 11am) ++SINGERS and musicians, contact me for info on books, albums, and misc musical fun; solweber-AT- JUNO.com ; web -- roundz.tripod.com Urgent message? Please phone. ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 10:22:27 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Return-Path: Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 13:26:40 -0500 From: Ridge Kennedy Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: RE: Potential NOMAD dates To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Rum & Onions, a day-long contra event, is held on the last weekend in Oct. Ridge Kennedy Washington, NJ [No Exit] When you stumble, make it part of the dance. ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 13:32:53 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 13:10:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan Winston - SSRL Central Computing Subject: Re: 19th/Early 20th Century ECD To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Message-ID: <01KF5PT8NXI89GCNPC-AT- SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; CHARSET=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Michael Serafin wrote: > Just out of curiousity, what was the status of ECD during the American Civil > War and the British and American Victorian eras? It was quite out of fashion in the urban ballroom, with a very few exceptions. (Virginia Reel / Roger de Coverly was still done.) By the early 1860s, Mr. Hillgrove's manual deprecates the old-fashioned and excessively merry contry dances, but gives six of them anyway. Contemporary accounts show that ballroom programs were overwhelmingly couple dance (waltz/galop/polka/polka redowa) and quadrilles. Contra dancing was still happening in rural New England, big circle in Appalachia, squares (presumably) in the Midwest and West, and "barn dance" country dances in rural England, but this was all off the radar of anyone who published (except for maybe Thomas Hardy). No market for dancing masters in ECD, no ECD publications. As population concentrated in the cities, no general exposure to ECD. This is why Sharp's efforts of the early 1900s are called a "revival." -- Alan =============================================================================== Alan Winston --- WINSTON-AT- SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD Disclaimer: I speak only for myself, not SLAC or SSRL Phone: 650/926-3056 Paper mail to: SSRL -- SLAC BIN 99, 2575 Sand Hill Rd, Menlo Park CA 94025 =============================================================================== ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 16:13:17 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 19:12:59 -0500 (EST) From: SallenNic-AT- aol.com Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Assembly Workshop Weekend To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <104.122fbb7e.29bbff0b-AT- aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT The weekend after next (March 23/24) we have our annual Workshop Weekend in Edinburgh. This year, following the success of having an overseas Teacher last year(Gene Murrow) we have the wonderful prospect of a weekend in the tender care of Simone Verheyen from Belgium. She has drawn up a really varied and interesting programme for the weekend, travelling from classic Playford to modern compositions (particularly those of Aegle Hoekstra) and on through to Contras and Squares. Anyone interested should have a look at www.nicolasbroadbridge.com where all details will be found, plus downloadable (I don't believe I just wrote a word like that!) forms. What is not there is the welcome which awaits anyone who cares to join us for all or part of the weekend, but that will have to be experienced "in the flesh"! Nicolas B., Lanark, Scotland. ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 09:16:40 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 12:16:21 -0500 (EST) From: ACFerg-AT- cs.com Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Potential NOMAD dates To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_3EQSlNnxV0C7QVB+GTHeaA)" --Boundary_(ID_3EQSlNnxV0C7QVB+GTHeaA) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT In a message dated 3/8/02 6:04:46 PM Eastern Standard Time, barbararuth-AT- rocketmail.com writes: > People have been asking about the next NOMAD date (annual fall > festival in Newtown, Connecticut for those who don't already know). > We just got the school schedule and the available dates for us are > Oct 18-20, or Oct 25-27. The school would prefer us on Oct. 18-20. > > Would people on this list let me know about potential conflicts? > The Boston CDS Fall Favorites dance will be on October 26. Arthur Ferguson --Boundary_(ID_3EQSlNnxV0C7QVB+GTHeaA) Content-type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT In a message dated 3/8/02 6:04:46 PM Eastern Standard Time, barbararuth-AT- rocketmail.com writes:


People have been asking about the next NOMAD date (annual fall
festival in Newtown, Connecticut for those who don't already know).  
We just got the school schedule and the available dates for us are
Oct 18-20, or Oct 25-27.  The school would prefer us on Oct. 18-20.

Would people on this list let me know about potential conflicts?


The Boston CDS Fall Favorites dance will be on October 26.

Arthur Ferguson
--Boundary_(ID_3EQSlNnxV0C7QVB+GTHeaA)-- ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 13:29:46 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 13:28:22 -0800 (PST) From: metis-AT- seki.mcs.csuhayward.edu Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Dancin' Fools (Barely on topic) To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <200203102128.g2ALSMo24571-AT- seki.mcs.csuhayward.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT The following post barely falls within list charter, and only because the editor or CDSS news asked about the following quote in the latest issue: "We're fools whether we dance or not, so we may as well dance." Nevertheless, perhaps my reply to the editor is of interest to some. I got my copy of CDSS news Friday and for once read through the whole thing right away. The quotation is actually from the lyrics of a regional folkdance called "Awa odori" from Tokushima prefecture on the island Shikoku that is just south of the main island, Honshuu, in Japan. ("Awa" is the old name for that region.) This dance is a "bon odori", i.e., a dance for the festival of returning ancestral spirits, which takes place in July/August each year. There are lots of different bon odori from various regions, but Awa odori has become extremely popular nationwide. Tourists come from all over Japan for the Bon Festival in Tokushima each year August 12-15. It has a combination of simplicity and exuberance that makes it easy to join in. One can often see it performed by various groups at neighborhood festivals in Tokyo, which is nowhere near the original source of the dance. (Similarly we have contradancing in California.) It's hard to describe Awa odori in words, so I've put a 4-minute mp3 file at for your listening pleasure. (Normally the dance would run for much longer; I have one CD of Awa odori that consists of just two 26-minute cuts.) Some of the websites listed below have pictures, and in any case, you can find useful links by inputting "awa odori" into Google. If you listen to the mp3, it starts with just instruments (shamisen, fife, drum, bells), then there are some encouraging shouts that have no literal meaning: "Ha! Yatosa! Yatosa!" [several times]. "Eraiyatcha! Eraiyatcha! Yoi yoi yoi yoi!" The actual lyric only comes about 2:40 in, done in a shouting style: "Odoru ahou ni miru ahou, onaji aho nara odoranya son son." which literally means: "We are foolish people who dance or see (people dance). If after all we are foolish, we lose if we don't dance." I think your translation in the newsletter "We're fools whether we dance or not, so we may as well dance." is quite idiomatic and on the mark. Then the next lyrics are sung very slowly. "Awa no dono sama hachisuka-kou ga ima ni nokoseshi Awa odori" "What Awa's Lord Hachisuka left us to the present day is Awa odori." I just found on the web that there was a Lord Hachisuka who came to Tokushima in 1585 and made it the capital of Awa (old name for that region). The same website: has some history and translates the famous phrase as: Dancers are fools; lookers-on are fools! If both are fools, why not be dancing fools! The name of the song, which dates back to the Edo period (1603-1867), is *Yoshikono bushi*. The liner notes tell me that this popular song spread throught the country and actually replaced the original *Haiya bushi* melody to which Awa odori was originally danced. I haven't been able to trace the history of this song yet, which is, of course, the original source of the verse. Doubtless the verse would be obscure by now except for its preservation in the folkdance context. The following are some of the better sites about Awa odori in English: http://www.country-dance.com/English/e-event/e-awaodori/awaodori-main.html http://jin.jcic.or.jp/kidsweb/calendar/august/awaodori.html http://jin.jcic.or.jp/atlas/festivals/fes12.html http://www1.pref.tokushima.jp/english/awaodori/odori1_e.html [Requires Shockwave] I thank my colleague Kazuo Yana for pointing me in the right direction and ensuring the accuracy of my translation. Tom/Sven Tom Roby Department of Math & CS metis-AT- seki.mcs.csuhayward.edu California State University [Fax] 510-885-4314,4169 25800 Carlos Bee Blvd. [Off] 510-885-2691,3591 Hayward, CA 945423092 http://seki.csuhayward.edu ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 13:37:00 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Return-Path: Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 16:37:07 -0500 From: "wlinden-AT- panix.com" Subject: RE: Dancin' Fools (Barely on topic) To: "ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu" Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT New York's public Obon Festival, run by the New York Buddhist Church, occurs in Bryant Park on the second Sunday in July, with all invited to join the BON ODORI. -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ . ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 14:32:58 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 16:33:08 -0600 From: Dianna Shipman Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Elverton Grove To: English Article Message-ID: <009e01c1c94c$bd69a780$69f6490c-AT- pavilion> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT I'm trying to work out the dance Elverton Grove. Any assistance appreciated on the following questions: are the figure 8s full figure 8s? in a 12 count? is it a skipping step? and if so, is the rest of the dance a walking step? is the dance "proper" throughout? Thanks, Dianna Houston, TX, USA ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 14:38:42 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 17:52:07 -0500 From: Graham.Christian-AT- risk.sungard.com Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Elverton Grove To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT The interpretation commonly used is that of Tom Cook. In it, the fig-8s are full and occupy 12 counts (and are a bit of race even at that). I don't remember whether or not Cook specifies sk.-s. for them, but I think you'd never make it without. The dance is proper. Very few "period" dances had improper couples (a few, but not many). "King of Poland" "The Woman's the Man," and a handful of others. Graham Christian Technical Writer, Product Management Telephone number: (617)542-2800, extension 247 Email address: graham.christian-AT- risk.sungard.com Group web address: http://www.risk.sungard.com SunGard Trading and Risk Systems, BancWare 3 Post Office Square Boston, MA 02109 "Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow." ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. ********************************************************************** ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 14:45:02 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 16:37:32 -0500 From: Sharon Green Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Elverton Grove To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20020311162812.0218cd50-AT- popserver.panix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT At 04:33 PM 3/11/2002 -0600, Dianna Shipman wrote: >I'm trying to work out the dance Elverton Grove. >Any assistance appreciated on the following questions: >are the figure 8s full figure 8s? Yes. > in a 12 count? Yes. >is it a skipping step? Yes. > and if so, is the rest of the dance a walking step? Yes. >is the dance "proper" throughout? I'm not sure what you mean. All are proper to start. In A1 (5-8), partners cross and loop right to face one another. At this point all are improper. However, A2 brings everyone back home, and all are proper throughout the B music. Elverton Grove is on our ball program [CDNY] and I believe the instructions are posted on our web site: www.cdny.org We follow Tom Cook's interpretation, as published in Come Let's Be Merry. It's a great dance--have fun! Sharon Green ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 15:09:27 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 23:07:25 +0000 From: Michael Barraclough Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: RE: Elverton Grove To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <000001c1c951$82b63e00$ad957ad5-AT- michael> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sharon Green wrote: >We follow Tom Cook's interpretation, as published in Come Let's Be Merry. For those seeking "authenticity" then beware that Tom Cook's interpretation has some significant differences from the original. Michael Barraclough http://www.mab.tgis.co.uk ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 05:14:13 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 08:11:49 -0500 From: Dick Wexelblat Subject: Re: Potential NOMAD dates To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Message-ID: <3C8DFE95.3030405-AT- comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT References: Prefer earlier...

ACFerg-AT- cs.com wrote:
In a message dated 3/8/02 6:04:46 PM Eastern Standard Time, barbararuth-AT- rocketmail.com writes:


People have been asking about the next NOMAD date (annual fall
festival in Newtown, Connecticut for those who don't already know).  
We just got the school schedule and the available dates for us are
Oct 18-20, or Oct 25-27.  The school would prefer us on Oct. 18-20.

Would people on this list let me know about potential conflicts?


The Boston CDS Fall Favorites dance will be on October 26.

Arthur Ferguson

================================================================================ Archive-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 06:43:45 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 08:43:44 -0600 From: Dianna Shipman Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Elverton Grove To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <00d601c1c9d4$5ce75a00$c9f2520c-AT- pavilion> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT References: <000001c1c951$82b63e00$ad957ad5-AT- michael> Can you suggest where I might be able to find the original? Thanks for all the great help from everyone who responded, Dianna ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Barraclough" To: Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 5:07 PM Subject: RE: Elverton Grove | Sharon Green wrote: | | >We follow Tom Cook's interpretation, as published in Come Let's Be | Merry. | | For those seeking "authenticity" then beware that Tom Cook's | interpretation has some significant differences from the original. | | Michael Barraclough | http://www.mab.tgis.co.uk | | | | ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 07:51:12 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 11:04:41 -0500 From: Graham.Christian-AT- risk.sungard.com Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Those ambiguous Elvertons! those dusky groves! was: Re: Elverton Grove To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Well, it just so happens that I have *EG* here with me. Here are the original instructions: 'All four turn single and foot it four times, the men change place with the wo. turn single all four meet with their backs together and foot it four times, all four to their proper places : | the two men lead through the two we. and the two we. through the two men, the first cupple go the whole figure through the 2 cupple, then the 2 cupple go the whole figure through the first cupple the first cupple cast off.' Yes, just like that. Like a number of others, I have a hunger for seeing the sources and making my own assessment of the adaptation. In this case, I always felt less than satisfied with Tom Cook's very quick fig.-8s, but whaddya know, they seem to be a feature of the original too. But beware! I would *never* recommend, just for the sake of authenticity, running the dance from these instructions and hoping it "works" (i.e., that there is time enough for the figures; that the tune and the figures match; that it progresses!). Nor running the dance from these instructions and assuming that you will have a satisfying dance. I have been (on and off) worrying at *EG* for a while now, like a dog with a tough bone, and while I view Tom Cook's changes as rather aggressive, I now don't wonder at them. I don't honestly quite know what the original choreographer intended in the A section (and while the music has the double || after bar 8 that *suggests* a repeat, as in other sources, it nowhere says, as it does in so many dances, "The first strain once, and the second strain but once"). I remain puzzled by the end of the B section (I cannot but be reminded of the period instructions that advise the leading couple to *run* the figure through). I don't think it's ever possible to say with conviction, Well, we'll just do what they did. Firstly: we don't and can't know with certainty what they did. Secondly: we have already (in ECD-land), for simplicity's sake, made certain notable compromises--e.g, not for the most part using period step-combinations; adapting many triple minors to duple minors; making certain assumptions (is "set" in 1650 related to "foot it" in 1710? how? we usually treat them as the same step) that link us and our work to other English Country Dancers around the world. Thirdly, do we *want* to do what they did? Are we re-enactors, or are we dancing for our pleasure and betterment? Myself, I always want to make an educated guess about what was happening on the floor of the Dancing Schoole--but I have very few qualms about making changes for modern dancers, so long as I show my work, as in a mathematics examination. There are the dances that may have used the tune they couldn't hear enough of in 1689, the "Macarena" or "Who Let the Dogs Out" of their day--but the dances themselves are negligible, and always were. There are the dances that may always have been aimed over the heads of garden-variety spa-town ballgoers. There are dances that are lost to us unless we use period stepwork (some instructions say, "This must be danced using the Minuet-step," and they are rarely wrong about that). In sum, all of the dances we love represent *compromises* with the splendid heritage. Tom Cook's "Elverton Grove" is not the dance that might have been danced under the nose of Congreve--but it needn't be. Graham P.S. For a real reconstructor's nightmare, see "Trip to the Camp," the other period dance to this tune. Oy vey 's mir. Graham Christian Technical Writer, Product Management Telephone number: (617)542-2800, extension 247 Email address: graham.christian-AT- risk.sungard.com Group web address: http://www.risk.sungard.com SunGard Trading and Risk Systems, BancWare 3 Post Office Square Boston, MA 02109 "Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow." ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. ********************************************************************** ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 08:52:16 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 16:52:04 +0000 (GMT) From: Michael Barraclough Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Elverton Grove To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <200203121652.QAA17286-AT- galahad.tgis.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Elverton Grove is in Vol II (3rd and 4th edns) of the Dancing Master which was published by John Young. It is also in Walsh's 24 for dances for 1712 (I think that's the right year). In The Dancing Master it is called A Trip to the Camp: Or, Elverton Grove. Tom Cooks version for modern consupmtion is published in Come Let's Be Merry, EFDSS, London 1975. ISBN 0 85418 113 X Michael Barraclough http://www.mab.tgis.co.uk On Tuesday, March 12, 2002 at 08:43:44 AM, ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU wrote: > Can you suggest where I might be able to find the original? > Thanks for all the great help from everyone who responded, > Dianna > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Barraclough" > To: > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 5:07 PM > Subject: RE: Elverton Grove > > > | Sharon Green wrote: > | > | >We follow Tom Cook's interpretation, as published in Come Let's Be > | Merry. > | > | For those seeking "authenticity" then beware that Tom Cook's > | interpretation has some significant differences from the original. > | > | Michael Barraclough > | http://www.mab.tgis.co.uk > | > | > | > | > > -- ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 09:19:23 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 12:17:56 -0500 From: Graham.Christian-AT- risk.sungard.com Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Elverton Grove (bibliographical) To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT "Elverton Grove is in Vol II (3rd and 4th edns) of the Dancing Master which was published by John Young. It is also in Walsh's 24 for dances for 1712 (I think that's the right year). In The Dancing Master it is called A Trip to the Camp: Or, Elverton Grove. Tom Cooks version for modern consupmtion is published in Come Let's Be Merry, EFDSS, London 1975. ISBN 0 85418 113 X" Quite so; *except* that Walsh's dance is "Elverton Grove"; Young's dance of 1728 or thereabouts is "A trip to the camp; or, Elverton Grove," and uses EG's tune, but has rather different (almost impossible! ) figures. Graham Christian Technical Writer, Product Management Telephone number: (617)542-2800, extension 247 Email address: graham.christian-AT- risk.sungard.com Group web address: http://www.risk.sungard.com SunGard Trading and Risk Systems, BancWare 3 Post Office Square Boston, MA 02109 "Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow." ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. ********************************************************************** ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 10:11:50 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 10:11:37 -0800 (PST) From: Barbara Ruth Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Those ambiguous Elvertons! -- Not to mention the spelling... To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <20020312181137.65822.qmail-AT- web13609.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT --- Graham.Christian-AT- risk.sungard.com wrote: > > Well, it just so happens that I have *EG* here with me. Now that is being prepared. Do you always carry instructions to ECD dances with you to work, just in case someone happens to ask for the original instructions to something? (Various snips follow) > Here are the > original instructions: > then the 2 cupple go the whole figure through > the first cupple the first cupple cast off.' > In this case, I always felt > less than > satisfied with Tom Cook's very quick fig.-8s, but whaddya know, > they seem to be a feature of the original too. > I have been (on and off) worrying at *EG* for a while now, like a > dog with > a tough bone, and while I view Tom Cook's changes as rather > aggressive, I now don't wonder at them. > we have already (in ECD-land), for simplicity's sake, made > certain notable compromises--e.g, not for the most part using > period > step-combinations; adapting many triple minors to duple minors; > making > certain assumptions (is "set" in 1650 related to "foot it" in 1710? > how? we > usually treat them as the same step) that link us and our work to > other > English Country Dancers around the world. Thirdly, do we *want* to > do what > they did? Are we re-enactors, or are we dancing for our pleasure > and > betterment? Graham, I am in complete agreement with you on the idea of making original sources available, but accepting that modern ECD is a phenomenon in its own right, that it's perfectly reasonable to adapt dances in ways to suit our enjoyment of them, with the caveat that we don't go so far as to "violate the spirit" of the dance, which of course will be a subjective assessment that differs from dancer to dancer. Given that, for me the absolute joy of Elverton Grove is in that first, and more imaginatively reconstructed section, with the balance back and then swooping in and back and then across the line. It is exactly the kind of ECD moment that makes my heart lift up with joy inside me. I remember dancing it at the end of a long and tiring NEFFA weekend, where I felt as though I could barely drag my body from one point to another, and as soon as the music to Elverton Grove began, feeling myself lifted up and carried on a swell of movement, music and pleasure. But like you, I have always been unsatisfied with the rushed figures of eight, and felt that their awkwardness is an unsightly price to pay for the beauty of the first section. As a dancer, I would happily greet further revisions on the part of any of you reconstructer/tinkerers who could tweak those figures of eight to make the second half as joyously lovely as the first. Barbara ===== "There is no inverse relationship between freedom and security. Less of one does not lead to more of the other. People with no rights are not safe from terrorist attack." Molly Ivins __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/ ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 13:14:46 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 16:16:48 -0400 From: Lou Vosteen Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Var. on Elveton Grove To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Here is a variation on Elverton Grove that seems to work and is not as hectic as the Cook version. A1 (same as before) All turn single and set (or balance fwd & back); cross over with partner and turn left to face A2 Repeat to places B1 1-8 (same as before) Men lead thru ladies; ladies lead thru men "The variation" 9-12 1st couple half fig 8 thru the 2's 13-14 All set once to partners (at this point the music is going "ta taa, ta taa") 15-18 2nd couple 1/2 fig up thru the 1's 19-22 1st couple cast off & cross as 2nd couple moves up crossing This version is based on another alternate version by John Millar. His version has the 1st couple complete a full fig 8 after the "all set" in bars 13-14 and then the 1's cast off as the 2's move up. (I liked the idea of giving the 2's something more to do since, after teaching a dance, I often find myself joining in at the bottom of the set.) Lou Vosteen ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 20:47:51 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 23:44:20 -0500 From: "Linda M. Nelson" Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Friday, March 15, 2002 - Cape Cod MA, USA To: ECD-AT- PLAYFORD.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT References: <000001c1c951$82b63e00$ad957ad5-AT- michael> For those who might be in the vicinity of Cape Cod, Massachusetts this Friday: a low-stress, enjoyable evening of English dancing: Cape Cod English Country Dance Friday, March 15 8 - 11 pm at the East Sandwich Grange, 85 Old County Road, E Sandwich Musicians: R.P. Hale (harpsichord) and Earl Gaddis (violin, viola) Dance Leaders: Priscilla Adams and Linda Nelson As always, all are welcome and all dances will be taught. Admission: $6 More info and driving directions: reply email, or 508-428-4231 or 508-540-1151 ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 09:39:36 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 17:41:33 +0000 From: francis2 Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: Re: Var. on Elveton Grove To: ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <000a01c1cab6$527d8160$fe3c3c3e-AT- oemcomputer> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT References: Surely, 19-22 is half a double fig of eight/Therefor with 2 1/2 figs of 8 and this double we have the equivalent of 2 whole figs of 8 as Per original. ergo nothing is saved. Top Cooks version is more fun to dance anyway. francis2. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lou Vosteen" To: Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 8:16 PM Subject: Var. on Elveton Grove > Here is a variation on Elverton Grove that seems to work and is not as > hectic as the Cook version. > > A1 (same as before) All turn single and set (or balance fwd & back); > cross over with partner and turn left to face > A2 Repeat to places > B1 1-8 (same as before) Men lead thru ladies; ladies lead thru men > "The variation" > 9-12 1st couple half fig 8 thru the 2's > 13-14 All set once to partners (at this point the music is going > "ta taa, ta taa") > 15-18 2nd couple 1/2 fig up thru the 1's > 19-22 1st couple cast off & cross as 2nd couple moves up crossing > > This version is based on another alternate version by John Millar. His > version has the 1st couple complete a full fig 8 after the "all set" in > bars 13-14 and then the 1's cast off as the 2's move up. > (I liked the idea of giving the 2's something more to do since, after > teaching a dance, I often find myself joining in at the bottom of the set.) > > > Lou Vosteen > > ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 10:03:00 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 18:00:55 +0000 From: Michael Barraclough Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Subject: ANOUNCE: UK, Wroughton, 23 March 2002 To: eceilidh-AT- netservs.com, allceilidh-AT- yahoogroups.com, ECD-AT- SSRL04.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU Message-ID: <000001c1cab9$06585fa0$548d7ad5-AT- michael> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT What? Wroughton Village Barn Dance Who? Expanding Waste Band Who else? Michael Barraclough Where? Ridgeway School, Inverary Road, Wroughton, Wilts When? Saturday 23rd March 2002, 7.30-11pm How much? £5 incl Ploughman’s Supper Tickets? 01793 812282 (Julia) or 01793 438410 (Jean) What else? Bar ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 07:51:55 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 10:49:17 -0500 From: Dick Wexelblat Subject: Paganism in British Folk Customs To: ECD Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Message-ID: <3C90C67D.10504-AT- comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT http://www.belinus.co.uk/folklore/PaganismFolkCustoms.htm ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 01:35:28 PST Sender: owner-ecd-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 03:38:34 -0600 From: Paul Stamler Subject: St. Louis: The Spring of Two Celebrations To: ecd list Reply-To: ECD-AT- playford.slac.stanford.edu Message-ID: <001001c1cc05$2de268c0$b8294b0c-AT- paulstam> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Hi folks: This April will see *two* celebrations put on by the St. Louis English Country Dancers: the annual Playford Ball, and (six days later) Miss Pamela's Cotillion, a special event featuring a variety of dance styles. The Playford Ball will be held on Saturday, April 6th at the First Congregational Church of St. Louis (UCC), 6501 Wydown Blvd. in Clayton, beginning at 7:30 p.m.; fancy dress (your definition). We'll have a list of the dances shortly, and it'll be posted on the website (see below). It's our first time in this building, and it looks like a good spot. To get there take US-40 to Clayton-Skinker (if you're coming from the city and points east) or McCausland (from points west); in either case, take McCausland or Skinker northwards until you get to Wydown. Turn left (west) on Wydown and go several blocks until you see the Washington University dormitories on the right. (If you get to Big Bend, you've gone too far.) Turn into the dormitory entrance, then *immdiately* turn right into the small parking lot. That's the church's lot; the church is on its east end. We're dancing upstairs; there is an elevator. Admission is $12.00 per person, $20 per couple, $25 per couple; students $5.00. As always at the Playford Ball, it's pot-luck snacks; bring things to munch on at intermission. And we need folks to help decorate; e-mail ASAP if you're available! Miss Pamela's Cotillion, a celebration of fiddler Pam Carson and the 10 years of music (and fun) she has given us, will be held Friday, April 12th at Church of the Holy Communion, Jackson at Delmar in University City (the site of our usual Friday dances -- map on the website). We'll be including a variety of dance styles, reflecting Pam's involvement in multiple dance communities; they'll include ECD (of course), waltzes, contras, hambo, ragtime two-step, a couple of international dances, and some surprises. There's a workshop beginning at 6:45, plus mini-workshops throughout the event -- all dances will be taught. Dancing starts at 7:30; fancy dress is admired but not required. Again, we'll welcome snacks and drinks, and beginners are *definitely* invited. Admission is $5.00 per person, $9.00 per couple, $10 per family. Come sample a variety of dances, celebrate the beginning of Pam's new adventure -- marriage and Cincinnati, in that order -- and thank her for all the great times we've had together. Music for both evenings will be provided by the Original Speckled Band; Peter Wollenberg and friends will call dances at the Playford Ball, while Peter will be joined at Miss Pamela's Cotillion by Rin Reagan & Patricia Dressler (ragtime), Martha Edwards & Bob Green (waltz), Bill & Becky Coalson (hambo), John Uhlemann (international) and callers to be named later. For more information please e-mail (pstamler-AT- pobox.com) or phone (314-664-9207), or check the website, listed below. Out-of-town dancers, please let us know if you'll need a place to stay; we can't guarantee one, but we'll try our best. Don't forget, while we're here, that there's one more English country dance before these two events! It happens Monday, March 25th, at Focal Point Arts Center, 2720 S. Sutton Blvd. in Maplewood; workshop at 7:00 sharp, dancing 7:30-9:3